All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Patients with high-risk (HR) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) continue to experience poor survival outcomes despite advances in novel combination therapies. The Multiple Myeloma Hub previously reported preliminary results from the phase II GMMG-CONCEPT trial (NCT03104842). During the European Hematology Association 2025 Congress, Lisa Leypoldt presented the final analysis of the primary endpoint, with a focus on the transplant-eligible cohort, evaluating the efficacy of isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd) in patients with HR NDMM.1 A total of 245 patients with HR NDMM were enrolled, including 219 patients in the transplant-eligible cohort, and 26 in the transplant-ineligible cohort. The primary endpoint was measurable residual disease negativity at a sensitivity of 10−5 after consolidation. A key secondary endpoint was progression-free survival.
|
Key learnings |
The primary endpoint was met, with 74.8% of patients in the TE cohort achieving MRD-negativity after consolidation. Sustained MRD-negativity for ≥1 year and ≥2 years was observed in 67.1% and 44.7% of TE patients, respectively. |
At a median follow-up of 43 months, median PFS in the TE cohort was 72.8 months, while median OS was not reached. Sustained MRD-negativity was associated with prolonged PFS compared with MRD-positivity (hazard ratio, 0.15; p < 0.0001). |
Carfilzomib administered weekly at 56 mg/m2 resulted in more dose reductions but fewer treatment discontinuations compared with the twice-weekly 36 mg/m2 regimen and is recommended in this setting. |
Isa-KRd demonstrated deep and durable MRD-negativity, supporting its potential as a standard-of-care regimen for patients with HR NDMM. |
HR, high-risk; Isa-KRd, isatuximab-carfilzomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; MRD, measurable residual disease; NDMM, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; TE, transplant-eligible.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
What is the most significant limitation you have identified when using lenalidomide or pomalidomide for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma?