All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Patients with newly diagnosed high-risk multiple myeloma have poor survival outcomes and few prospective trials aiming to determine the optimal treatment strategy. Measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity is the strongest predictor of survival; therefore, is crucial for this patient population.
Leypoldt et al.1 recently published results from the phase II GMMG-CONCEPT trial (NCT03104842) in Journal of Clinical Oncology investigating transplant-eligible (TE) and transplant-non-eligible (TNE) patients with newly diagnosed high-risk multiple myeloma treated with isatuximab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (Isa-KRd), followed by triplet maintenance. We summarize the key points below.
Figure 1. Response rates of TE and TNE patients treated with Isa-KRd*
CR, complete response; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; TE, transplant-eligible; TNE, transplant-non-eligible; VGPR, very good PR.
*Adapted from Leypoldt, et al.1
Figure 2. Rates of sustained MRD negativity at ≥6 months and ≥12 months in TE and TNE patients treated with Isa-KRd*
MRD, measurable residual disease; TE, transplant-eligible; TNE, transplant-non-eligible.
*Adapted from Leypoldt, et al.1
Key learnings |
---|
|
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox