All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Updated recommendations for the management of patients with MM: EHA-EMN evidence-based guidelines

Share:

Aug 26, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in multiple myeloma.


 

The European Hematology Association (EHA) and European Myeloma Network (EMN) have published updated evidence-based guidelines for the diagnosis, treatment, and follow-up of multiple myeloma, building on the 2021 EHA–ESMO recommendations, in Nature Reviews Clinical Oncology.

The 2025 revision incorporates advances across the field, including in prognostic assessment, expanded use of measurable residual disease to inform treatment, the adoption of quadruplet induction regimens as new standards, evolving management of high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma, earlier use of immunotherapies in relapsed/refractory disease, and care and management of patients with complications.

 

Key learnings

Risk assessment recommendations have been updated to the R2-ISS, with high-risk criteria now incorporating cytogenetics, biochemical markers, and emerging tools such as circulating plasma cell quantification and mass spectrometry.

Sustained MRD negativity is now recognized as a regulatory trial endpoint and is increasingly used to guide treatment decisions, with PET-CT and diffusion-weighted MRI recommended alongside bone marrow testing to determine MRD status.

Quadruplet regimens are emerging as the new standard for first-line therapy, with DaraVRd and IsaVRd preferred for many newly diagnosed patients and daratumumab + lenalidomide maintenance replacing lenalidomide alone after transplant.

Immunotherapies are being applied earlier in the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma, with CAR T-cell therapies, bispecific antibodies, and antibody–drug conjugates increasingly used in earlier lines of therapy and treatment choices individualized based on prior treatment exposure and refractoriness.

Patients with high-risk smoldering MM may benefit from early treatment, with evidence supporting daratumumab monotherapy to delay disease progression and improve survival, although regulatory approval was pending at the time of publication.

CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; Dara, daratumumab; DaraVRd, daratumumab + bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; IsaVRd, isatuximab + bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone; MM, multiple myeloma; MRD, measurable residual disease; NDMM, newly diagnosed MM; PET-CT, positron emission tomography-computed tomography; R2-ISS, Second Revision of the International Staging System.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Which of the following reflects your thoughts about the possibility of implementing a novel drug delivery device at your clinical practice site?