All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, and Roche. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Optimizing BCMA-directed therapies: Balancing efficacy, safety, and PROs

By Jennifer Reilly

Share:

Featured:

Hang QuachHang Quach

Apr 17, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to describe the role of dose modification in optimizing efficacy, safety, and quality of life with BCMA-directed therapies in multiple myeloma.


Do you know... In the DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 studies evaluating belantamab mafodotin-based combinations, how were treatment responses impacted among patients who required dose delays?

On March 5, 2026, the Multiple Myeloma Hub held a virtual symposium, titled Optimizing dosing of BCMA-directed therapies for improved quality of life in multiple myeloma. During the symposium, Hang Quach, St Vincent’s Hospital Melbourne and University of Melbourne, Melbourne, AU, delivered a presentation on optimizing dosing strategies for B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed therapies in multiple myeloma (MM). 

In this presentation, Quach discusses the importance of dose modification in the real-world use of BCMA-directed therapies and emphasizes the need to balance efficacy and safety with long-term quality of life (QoL). Quach outlines dosing strategies for belantamab mafodotin and bispecific antibodies, and shares key clinical and patient-reported outcome (PRO) data demonstrating the impact of dose adaptation on toxicity and QoL (Figures 1, 2, and 3). 

Figure 1. Impact of dose modifications on outcomes with belantamab mafodotin*

Figure 2. Impact of dose modifications on the incidence of new-onset Grade ≥3 infections with teclistamab* 

Figure 3. Impact of dose modifications on the incidence of new-onset infections with elranatamab in MagnetisMM-3* 

Optimizing BCMA-directed therapies: Balancing efficacy, safety, and PROs

Key points 

  • Dose modification is a key component of optimizing outcomes with BCMA-directed therapies, particularly in the real-world setting. 
  • Unlike CAR T-cell therapy, bispecific antibodies and ADCs are administered continuously and therefore require ongoing management of toxicity. 
  • Dose optimization aims not only to reduce toxicity, but also to maintain patients on effective treatment for longer and preserve efficacy. 
  • Treatment-related toxicity and early discontinuation are associated with poorer outcomes, particularly in older and frail patients with relapsed/refractory MM.4 
  • Recommended dosing strategies for bispecific antibodies include step-up dosing followed by interval extension in patients who achieve a predefined response level or duration of response. 
  • Extended dosing intervals with bispecific antibodies have been associated with a reduced incidence of severe infections.2 
  • Early dose de-escalation in real-world practice may occur in response to adverse events and patient frailty.2,5,6 
  • Transient declines in QoL may occur early during treatment, particularly in association with cytokine release syndrome, but these are generally temporary.7 
  • Belantamab mafodotin, an ADC, is associated with ocular adverse events, which are typically reversible and often guide dose modification in clinical practice.8,9  
  • In clinical trials, dose delays have been used to manage ocular toxicity without compromising efficacy. 
  • PROs from clinical studies indicate that, despite treatment-related adverse events, overall QoL is maintained or improved over time. 
  • Fatigue and appetite changes may have a greater impact on QoL than treatment-specific adverse events such as ocular toxicity. 
  • Improvements in QoL are associated with early disease control achieved with BCMA-directed therapies.1–3  
  • Personalized dosing strategies are important to balance treatment efficacy with tolerability and QoL. 

This independent educational activity was supported by GSK. All content was developed independently by SES in collaboration with the faculty. The funder was allowed no influence on the content of this activity. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content