All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, and Roche. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Results from ATLAS (NCT02659293), a multicenter, open-label, randomized, phase III trial, evaluating carfilzomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (KRd; n = 92) vs lenalidomide alone (n = 88) as maintenance therapy, incorporating a measurable residual disease (MRD)-guided de‑escalation strategy, after autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT) in adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) and at least stable disease, were published in The Lancet Haematology by Dytfeld et al. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS).
Key data: With a median follow-up of 69 months, 4-year PFS was 67.5% with KRd vs 38.0% with lenalidomide (p < 0.0001); median PFS was longer with KRd (72.8 months vs 37.3 months; hazard ratio [HR], 0.46; p = 0.0002). Median overall survival (OS) was not reached with KRd vs 82.2 months with lenalidomide (HR, 0.49; p = 0.020). MRD negativity rates at best response were higher with KRd vs lenalidomide (73% vs 48%; p = 0.0007). No new safety signals were observed.
Key learning: KRd demonstrated superior PFS and evidence of improved OS, though not a predefined endpoint, compared with lenalidomide alone after auto-HSCT in NDMM, supporting MRD-adapted maintenance intensification in this setting.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content