All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

CARTITUDE-2: Cilta-cel ± Len maintenance for MM with suboptimal response to ASCT

Featured:

María-Victoria MateosMaría-Victoria Mateos

Sep 30, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite the latest clinical data for patients with multiple myeloma and suboptimal response to ASCT.


Do you know... In the updated follow-up (40.2 months) of CARTITUDE-2 cohort D, what were the 36-month PFS and OS rates for patients treated with Cilta-cel ± Len maintenance?

The Multiple Myeloma Hub spoke with María-Victoria Mateos, University Hospital of Salamanca, ES. We asked about the latest findings from the updated follow-up of CARTITUDE-2 Cohort D. 

During this interview, Mateos discussed the latest outcomes from the phase II CARTITUDE-2, multicohort study evaluating ciltacabtagene autoleucel (Cilta-cel) across various clinical settings of unmet need. She covered the updated follow-up data (40.2 months) from Cohort D from the trial, which were presented at the 22nd IMS Annual Meeting (September, 17–20, 2025), investigating Cilta-cel + lenalidomide (Len) maintenance in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who achieved less than a complete response (CR) after autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) as first-line therapy (N = 17). Mateos highlighted the deep and durable responses to treatment, including achievement of measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity, and noted that no new safety signals were reported with the longer follow-up. She concluded that the benefit–risk ratio of Cilta-cel continues to be favorable for this patient population. 

CARTITUDE-2: Cilta-cel ± Len maintenance for MM with suboptimal response to ASCT

Key learnings

  • As of February 2025, 17 patients had received Cilta-cel in Cohort D of CARTITUDE-2, with a median follow-up of 40.2 months. At baseline:
    • Median time from initial diagnosis to enrollment was less than 1 year.
    • The majority of patients had been treated with proteasome inhibitors only; three patients had received prior anti-CD38 monoclonal antibodies.
  • In the 12 patients who received continuous Len maintenance after Cilta-cel, Len was given at a dose of 10 mg daily upon adequate hematological recovery. The median time to initiation of Len maintenance was 51 days, with a median duration of 696.5 days, and the number of cycles ranged from 3 to 34, with a median overall relative dose intensity of 93.4%.
  • Objective response rate (ORR; defined as the proportion of patients who achieved ≥ partial response per the International Myeloma Working Group criteria) was achieved by 94.1% of patients treated with Cilta-cel; all of these patients had stringent CR.
  • Of the 16 responders, 14 were alive and in ≥CR (follow-up range, 13.4–55.9 months), including 1 patient lost to follow-up on Day 407.
    • One patient progressed and died of MM at 11 months.
    • One patient died in a motor vehicle accident while in response at 42 months.
  • Overall, of 16 evaluable patients MRD negativity was achieved in 81.3%; MRD negative ≥CR rate was 72.7% at 24 months and 75.0% at 36 months.
  • At 3 years, progression-free survival and overall survival were >90%.
  • No new safety signals were observed in the longer follow-up, with six patients experiencing CAR T-cell therapy-related neurotoxicities; in addition, there were no cases of parkinsonism or Guillain-Barré syndrome and no new second primary malignancies.
  • Overall, the benefit–risk ratio of Cilta-cel continues to be favorable for patients with NDMM with less than a CR after first-line ASCT.
  • There is a need for a randomized, phase III trial to further evaluate the role of Len maintenance after CAR T-cell therapy in patients with MM. 

This educational resource is independently supported by Legend Biotech. All content was developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee. Funders were allowed no influence on the content of this resource.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

HCPs, which of the following best characterizes your perception of belantamab mafodotin in combination (BVd, BPd) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma?