TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Should we use melflufen to treat relapsed patients with poor prognosis?

Featured:

Paul RichardsonPaul Richardson

Feb 1, 2021


Video series

During the 62nd American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the Multiple Myeloma Hub spoke to Paul G. Richardson, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, US. We asked, Should we use melflufen to treat relapsed patients with poor prognosis?

Richardson discusses promising data from the HORIZON trial evaluating melflufen, a highly lipophilic peptide-drug conjugate, in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma. Richardson then discusses preliminary data from the ANCHOR study, evaluating melflufen in combination with dexamethasone, and either daratumumab or bortezomib, in patients with relapsed/refractory myeloma.