TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Melflufen for triple-class refractory multiple myeloma | Final topline results from the phase II HORIZON study released

By Claire Baker

Share:

Featured:

Paul RichardsonPaul Richardson

Apr 28, 2020


The final topline results from the phase II HORIZON (NCT02963493) study have recently been released. The trial investigated the efficacy and safety of melphalan flufenamide (melflufen) plus dexamethasone for the treatment of patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).1 The results demonstrate favorable efficacy and safety profiles for melflufen in patients with RRMM, including those with triple-class refractory- and extramedullary disease (Table 1).The data from this study are set to form the foundations of a new drug application (NDA) for accelerated approval to the U.S. Food & Drug Administration (FDA).1

Table 1. Primary endpoint results of the HORIZON study

EMD, extramedullary disease; IRC, independent review committee; ITT, intention to treat; ORR, overall response rate

*Two unconfirmed responders on January 14 have later been confirmed.

Primary endpoint, %

Investigator assessed (January 14)

IRC (January 14)

Including unconfirmed responses at time of data cut-off *                                                

ORR in the ITT population (n = 157)

29

 30

31 (investigator and IRC)

ORR in triple-class refractory patients (n = 119)

26

26

27

ORR in patients with EMD (n = 55)

24

27

NA                                 

 A previous analysis of the HORIZON study was presented by Paul Richardson at the 24th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA). Read the MM Hub coverage here.

Expert Opinion

Paul RichardsonPaul Richardson

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content