All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Abbvie, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Legend Biotech and Caribou Biosciences. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

MonumenTAL-3: Talquetamab-based combinations for RRMM

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Jul 30, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


Results from the randomized, multicenter, phase III MonumenTAL-3 trial (NCT05455320) evaluating talquetamab-containing combination regimens in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were published in The New England Journal of Medicine by Mina et al. Patients (N = 864) who had previously received at least one line of therapy, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor, with no prior exposure to pomalidomide or G protein-coupled receptor class C group 5 member D (GPRC5D)-directed therapy, were randomly assigned 1:1:1 to receive talquetamab + daratumumab + pomalidomide (Tal-DP; n = 287), talquetamab + daratumumab (Tal-D; n = 287), or daratumumab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone (DPd; n = 290).

Key data: At a median follow-up of 24.6 months, the 24-month progression-free survival (PFS) rate was higher with Tal-DP and Tal-D than with DPd (81.3% and 77.6% vs 51.2%; hazard ratio [HR], 0.28 [95% confidence interval (CI), 0.20–0.40] and 0.33 [95% CI, 0.24–0.46]; p < 0.001 for both). The overall response rate (ORR) was higher with Tal-DP and Tal-D than with DPd (88.2% and 88.5% vs 77.6%; p < 0.001 for both). Complete response (CR) or better (≥CR) was achieved in 71.1%, 69.0%, and 34.5% of patients, while measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative CR at a sensitivity of 10-5 was achieved in 52.3%, 46.3%, and 15.9%, respectively (p < 0.001 for both). The 24-month overall survival (OS) estimates were 89.2%, 87.9%, and 79.1%, respectively. Serious adverse events (SAEs) occurred in 63.0%, 52.6%, and 53.7% of patients in the Tal-DP, Tal-D, and DPd groups, respectively.

Key learning: Both Tal-DP and Tal-D resulted in prolonged PFS and higher rates of ≥CR and MRD-negative CR than DPd, supporting these combinations as additional treatment options for patients with RRMM who have received at least one prior line of therapy.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content