The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
The combination of bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (VRd) is considered the standard of care for patients with newly diagnosed (ND) multiple myeloma (MM).1,2 The phase III IMROZ trial (NCT03319667) is evaluating whether addition of isatuximab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, to the VRd regimen (Isa-VRd) improves outcomes for patients with NDMM who are ineligible for transplantation.1,2 Interim results from this trial were presented by Facon1 during the 2024 American Society of Clinical Oncology (ASCO) Annual Meeting and have been published in The New England Journal of Medicine by Facon et al.2 |
Key learnings: |
The IMROZ study met its primary endpoint of PFS: median PFS was not reached at 54.34 months, and the 60-month PFS rate was 63.2% and 45.2%, in the Isa-VRd and VRd arms, respectively. |
After a median follow-up of 5 years, Isa-VRd was associated with a 40.4% reduction in the risk of progression or death vs VRd. |
Isa-VRd was also associated with a higher complete response (CR) rate (74.7% vs 64.1%), a higher measurable residual disease-negative (MRD−) CR rate (55.5% vs 40.9; p = 0.003), and a higher rate of sustained MRD− for ≥12 months (46.8% vs 24.3%) when compared with VRd. |
The improved efficacy with Isa-VRd, combined with a tolerable safety profile, suggests that Isa-VRd could be a new standard of care for transplant-ineligible patients with NDMM. |
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content