All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, and Roche. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Results from the real-world observational INSIGHT-MM study (NCT02761187), evaluating outcomes across three different proteasome inhibitors (PIs), plus lenalidomide + dexamethasone (Rd), in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), were recently published in the European Journal of Haematology by Puig et al. Data from 348 patients were included and evaluated based on the PI-Rd regimen initiated (ixazomib + Rd [IRd], carfilzomib + Rd [KRd], and bortezomib + Rd [VRd]). Endpoints included real-world progression-free survival (rwPFS), best response to therapy, and safety.
Key data: Overall, 356 lines of therapy (IRd, n = 181; KRd, n = 96; VRd, n = 79) were included. After a median follow-up of 17.5 months in the IRd cohort, and 18.4 months in the KRd and VRd cohorts, median rwPFS for the IRd, KRd, and VRd cohorts was 14.5, 13.2, and 9.1 months, respectively. Overall response rates (ORRs) were 60.8% for IRd, 72.2% for KRd, and 58.1% for VRd, with complete response (CR) or better observed in 10.5%, 34.7%, and 11.3% of patients in the IRd, KRd, and VRd cohorts, respectively. The rates of adverse events (AEs) per person-year were similar across treatment groups at 0.46 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.37–0.57), 0.55 (95% CI, 0.40–0.74), and 0.41 (95% CI, 0.25–0.62) in the IRd, KRd, and VRd cohorts, respectively.
Key learning: IRd, KRd, and VRd demonstrated comparable real-world efficacy and safety profiles in RRMM, supporting individualized selection of PI-based regimens based on patient-specific factors.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
On average, how many patients with MGUS/smoldering MM do you see in a month?