All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Results from the randomized phase II LYNX (NCT03871829) study comparing subcutaneous daratumumab + carfilzomib + dexamethasone (DaraKd) vs carfilzomib + dexamethasone (Kd) in 82 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who received previous treatment with daratumumab were recently published in Leukemia & Lymphoma by Bahlis et al.
Key data: At a median follow-up of 16.8 months, no significant differences in rates of very good partial response or better were found between treatment groups (DaraKd, 45.5%; Kd, 40.9%; odds ratio, 1.20; 90% confidence interval [CI], 0.59–2.46; p = 0.68). At data cutoff, median progression-free survival (PFS) was comparable (DaraKd, 10.7 months; Kd, 10.6 months; hazard ratio, 0.79; 90% CI, 0.49–1.28; p = 0.42). No new safety concerns were identified.
Key learning: Daratumumab retreatment with DaraKd did not demonstrate significant benefit over Kd alone in patients with RRMM and prior daratumumab exposure, though the study was limited by slow enrollment and early termination. Future studies are needed to optimize daratumumab-based regimens for this patient population.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content