All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Impact of response to bridging therapy on outcomes following cilta-cel infusion

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Jan 13, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


Post hoc analyses from the phase III CARTITUDE-4 trial (NCT04181827), evaluating the correlation between response to bridging therapy and post-infusion outcomes with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) in 196 patients with relapsed, lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (MM), were presented by Binod Dhakal at the 67th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, December 6–9, 2025, Orlando, US. Bridging therapies included pomalidomidebortezomib, and dexamethasone (PVd) or daratumumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (DPd).

Key data: Patients who experienced a very good partial response or better (≥VGPR) after bridging therapy had numerically longer 30-month progression-free survival (PFS; 75.9%) and overall survival (OS; 85.1%) vs patients with progressive disease (PD), whose corresponding rates were 30.0% and 40.0%, respectively. Rates of several adverse events (AEs) of special interest were lower among patients achieving deeper responses to bridging therapy, with no movement or neurocognitive treatment-emergent AEs (MNTs) reported in patients experiencing partial response or better (≥PR). Fatal infections occurred in 2.4% of patients with ≥VGPR compared with 15.0% of those with PD.

Key learning: Deeper response to bridging therapy prior to cilta-cel infusion was associated with longer PFS and OS, fewer neurocognitive AEs, and lower rates of fatal infection. These findings highlight the potential clinical relevance of optimizing disease control during the bridging period.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

HCPs, how confident do you feel discussing ocular care and potential concerns associated with belantamab mafodotin with your patients?