All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, and Roche. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Results from FREEDOMM, a retrospective, real-world study evaluating outcomes with ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) for the treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) after ≥4 prior lines of therapy (LoT), were published in Advances in Therapy by Ailawadhi et al. Outcomes were stratified according to bridging therapy (BT) use and regimen type (BT, n = 182; no BT, n = 60).
Key data: At a median follow-up of 11 months, estimated treatment-free interval (TFI) rates at 6, 12, and 18 months were 94.0%, 89.0%, and 80.3%, respectively; corresponding overall survival (OS) rates were 97.3%, 93.4%, and 93.4%. Median TFI and OS were not reached. BT regimens were heterogeneous, commonly including proteasome inhibitors (PIs; 43.4%), monoclonal antibodies (mAbs; 31.4%), alkylators (18.2%), and immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs; 16.9%). Compared with no BT, receipt of BT was associated with numerically lower risks of a TFI event (adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 0.76; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.32–1.80; p = 0.526) and death (aHR, 0.48; 95% CI, 0.13–1.70; p = 0.254), although differences were not significant.
Key learning: In the real-world setting, cilta-cel was associated with durable TFI and OS in heavily pretreated patients with RRMM. BT was commonly used prior to infusion, although differences in outcomes according to BT use did not reach statistical significance.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content