All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, and Roche. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

CARTITUDE-4 updated analysis: Cilta-cel for Len-refractory MM

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Mar 20, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


Updated analyses from phase III CARTITUDE‑4 (NCT04181827), evaluating ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel; n = 208) vs standard-of-care (SoC) pomalidomidebortezomibdexamethasone (n = 28) or daratumumab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone (n = 183) for the treatment of lenalidomide-refractory multiple myeloma (MM) after 1–3 prior lines of therapy, were published in The Lancet Oncology by Einsele et al.

Key data: At a median follow-up of 33.6 months, median progression-free survival (PFS) was not reached (NR) with cilta-cel (95% confidence interval [CI], 34.5 months–not evaluable [NE]) vs 11.8 months (95% CI, 9.7–14.0) with SoC, corresponding to a 71% reduction in the risk of progression or death (hazard ratio [HR], 0.29; 95% CI, 0.22–0.39). Median overall survival (OS) was NR in either arm but favored cilta-cel (HR, 0.55; 95% CI, 0.39–0.79; p = 0.0009). Complete response or better occurred in 77% of patients with cilta-cel and 24% with SoC. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 89% and 93%, respectively.

Key learning: Cilta-cel was associated with extended PFS and OS, and deeper responses compared with SoC regimens in lenalidomide-refractory MM after 1–3 prior therapies.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with MGUS/smoldering MM do you see in a month?