All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, and Roche. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Optimizing selection of bridging therapies prior to CAR T-cell therapy for MM

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Mar 9, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


Clinical guidance from an expert roundtable on the selection of bridging therapy prior to chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy for multiple myeloma (MM) was recently published by Ailawadhi et al. in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia. The review provides practical guidance for optimizing bridging therapy to maintain CAR-T eligibility, reduce tumor burden, and support favorable post-infusion outcomes across patient populations.

Key data: Bridging therapy should be individualized based on disease burden, prior treatment exposure, and patient-specific factors, with preference for agents to which the patient is not refractory. Rate of progression should also be considered; patients with aggressive or high-tumor burden disease may require more intensive therapy. The least intensive regimen is recommended, with triplet regimens often appropriate for a lower tumor burden and quadruplet regimens considered for a higher tumor burden. Logistical factors including anticipated manufacturing time and proximity to a treatment center may also influence selection.

Key learning: Optimal bridging prior to CAR T-cell therapy requires an individualized approach based on clinical and logistical factors, including disease burden, rate of progression, and patient-specific factors. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

On average, how many patients with MGUS/smoldering MM do you see in a month?