All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Legend Biotech and Caribou Biosciences. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Do you know... Daratumumab monotherapy versus active monitoring demonstrated a significant progression-free survival benefit in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma in which phase III study?
The Multiple Myeloma Hub spoke with María-Victoria Mateos, University Hospital of Salamanca, Salamanca, ES. We asked about evolving diagnostic criteria for high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma (MM).
During this interview, Mateos discussed the latest updates in the diagnosis, prognosis, and management of high-risk smoldering MM. The discussion covered the diagnostic criteria that distinguish smoldering MM from monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance and active MM, with emphasis on the role of myeloma-defining events. Mateos outlined updates to risk stratification models, including the International Myeloma Working Group 2/20/20 model and its integration with cytogenetics, along with alternative approaches such as flow cytometry, positive emission tomography imaging, genomic profiling, and dynamic models like PANGEA. Mateos highlighted the importance of identifying patients with high-risk smoldering MM, given the significantly higher risk of progression among these patients, and reviewed data from clinical trials supporting therapeutic intervention in this setting. Mateos concluded with an overview of more novel approaches under investigation, including CAR T-cell therapies and bispecific antibodies.
Evolving diagnostic criteria for high-risk smoldering MM
Evolving diagnostic criteria for high-risk smoldering MM
CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; CRAB, calcium levels, renal dysfunction, anemia, and bone lesions; CT, computed tomography; Ig, immunoglobin; IMWG, International Myeloma Working Group; MM, multiple myeloma; M-protein, monoclonal protein; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; PET, positron emission tomography.
References
Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538-548. DOI: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70442-5
Kyle RA, Remstein ED, Therneau TM, et al. Clinical course and prognosis of smoldering (asymptomatic) multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(25):2582-2590. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa070389
Mateos MV, Kumar S, Dimopoulos MA, et al. International Myeloma Working Group risk stratification model for smoldering multiple myeloma (SMM). Blood Cancer J. 2020;10(10):102. DOI: 10.1038/s41408-020-00366-3
Dimopoulos MA, Voorhees PM, Schjesvold F, et al. Daratumumab or Active Monitoring for High-Risk Smoldering Multiple Myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2025;392(18):1777-1788. DOI: 10.1056/NEJMoa2409029
Lonial S, Jacobus SJ, Weiss M, et al. E3A06: Randomized phase III trial of lenalidomide versus observation alone in patients with asymptomatic high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma. J Clin Oncol. 2019;37(15_suppl):8001-8001. DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2019.37.15_suppl.8001
Mateos MV, Hernández MT, Salvador C, et al. Lenalidomide-dexamethasone versus observation in high-risk smoldering myeloma after 12 years of median follow-up time: A randomized, open-label study. Eur J Cancer. 2022;174:243-250. DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2022.07.030
Kazandjian D, Hill E, Dew A, et al. Carfilzomib, Lenalidomide, and Dexamethasone Followed by Lenalidomide Maintenance for Prevention of Symptomatic Multiple Myeloma in Patients With High-risk Smoldering Myeloma: A Phase 2 Nonrandomized Controlled Trial. JAMA Oncol. 2021;7(11):1678-1685. DOI: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2021.3971
Johnson & Johnson. European Commission approves DARZALEX® (daratumumab) as the first licensed treatment for patients with high-risk smouldering multiple myeloma. https://www.jnj.com/media-center/press-releases/european-commission-approves-darzalex-daratumumab-as-the-first-licensed-treatment-for-patients-with-high-risk-smouldering-multiple-myeloma. Published online July 23, 2025. Accessed August 21, 2025.
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.