All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

SC daratumumab monotherapy for the treatment of high-risk smoldering MM

By Jennifer Reilly

Share:

May 26, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in smoldering MM.



Daratumumab, an anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody, is a standard-of-care therapy for the treatment of patients with MM. However, evidence on its applications in patients with high-risk SMM remains limited.1

Results from the randomized, phase III AQUILA study (NCT03301220), evaluating the efficacy and safety of SC daratumumab monotherapy in patients with high-risk SMM, aiming to delay progression to active MM, were published by Dimopoulos et al. in The New England Journal of Medicine.1 A total of 390 patients with high-risk SMM were enrolled across 23 countries and received either SC daratumumab 1,800 mg (n = 194) or active monitoring (n = 196). The primary end point was PFS, which was evaluated in an analysis of time from randomization to initial documentation of disease progression to active MM or death from any cause – whichever occurred first.1

 

Key learnings1

Daratumumab significantly reduced the risk of progression to active MM or death by 51% vs active monitoring (HR: 0.49; 95% CI: 0.36–0.67; p < 0.001). The 5-year PFS rate was 63.1% with daratumumab vs 40.8% with active monitoring, with OS rates of 93.0% vs 86.9%.

Initiation of first-line therapy for active MM was required in 33.2% of patients in the daratumumab group vs 53.6% in the active monitoring group.

Grade 3/4 AEs occurred in 40.4% of patients treated with daratumumab vs 30.1% with active monitoring, with hypertension being the most common. Serious AEs were reported in 29.0% and 19.4% of patients, respectively, and 5.7% of patients in the daratumumab group required treatment discontinuation.

Subcutaneous daratumumab monotherapy was associated with a significantly reduced risk of progression to active MM or death, with higher OS rates, vs active monitoring in patients with high-risk smoldering MM, with no unexpected safety concerns identified.

Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; CI, confidence interval; HR, hazard ratio; MM, multiple myeloma; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; SC, subcutaneous; SMM, smoldering MM. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content