All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Risk stratification and prognosis in smoldering MM

By Jennifer Reilly

Share:

Featured:

Irene GhobrialIrene Ghobrial

Sep 9, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to recall strategies for risk stratification and prognosis in smoldering multiple myeloma.


Do you know... What is the approximate 2-year risk for progression to active myeloma in patients with high-risk smoldering multiple myeloma?

The Multiple Myeloma Hub spoke to Irene Ghobrial, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, US. We asked about risk stratification and prognosis in smoldering multiple myeloma (MM).

During this interview, Ghobrial discussed risk stratification and prognosis in smoldering MM, with a focus on whether high-risk smoldering MM should be treated early. Ghobrial emphasized the heterogeneity of the condition, which ranges from indolent disease to high-risk cases with an approximately 50% likelihood of progression within 2 years.1 High-risk smoldering MM is a true malignancy, with plasma cells actively proliferating despite the absence of symptoms or myeloma-defining events. Early treatment was highlighted as a potential opportunity to achieve long-term disease control, with supporting data from the AQUILA study and other clinical trials indicating that therapies such as daratumumab can improve progression-free and overall survival for these patients. Ghobrial concluded by noting that advances in immunotherapy, including bispecific antibodies and CAR T-cell therapy, may enable earlier, fixed-duration treatment strategies that prevent end-organ damage and potentially achieve cure in high-risk smoldering MM.

Risk stratification and prognosis in smoldering MM

Risk stratification and prognosis in smoldering MM

Key learnings

  • Smoldering MM is a heterogeneous condition, with some patients never progressing and others rapidly progressing to a diagnosis of active MM.

  • High-risk smoldering MM is characterized by approximately a 50% chance of progression within 2 years.1

  • Patients with high-risk smoldering MM do not meet criteria for active myeloma but possess malignant plasma cells that are actively proliferating despite the absence of symptoms.

  • The biology of high-risk smoldering MM supports its classification as a malignancy rather than a benign precursor state, making it a potential target for early therapeutic intervention.

  • Treating patients earlier in the disease course, before immune dysfunction accumulates, may improve the likelihood of durable disease control or cure.

  • Data from the phase III AQUILA (NCT03301220) study demonstrate that treatment with daratumumab can significantly improve progression-free survival and overall survival compared with observation in high-risk smoldering MM, leading to European regulatory approval in July 2025 and U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) consideration.2

  • Early treatment strategies have potential for fixed-duration treatment with the goal of achieving deep responses, including measurable residual disease negativity which would then allow patients to discontinue treatment.

  • Advances in immunotherapy, such as novel bispecific antibodies and chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapies, provide additional opportunities for effective early intervention in high-risk smoldering MM.

  • The long-term goals for smoldering MM are to detect high-risk disease through screening, intervene before end-organ damage occurs, and potentially prevent progression to active MM altogether.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Which of the following reflects your thoughts about the possibility of implementing a novel drug delivery device at your clinical practice site?