All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, Bristol Myers Squibb, Caribou Biosciences, GSK, Johnson & Johnson Innovative Medicine, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, and Roche. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content.The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

SUCCESSOR-2 phase III: MeziKd vs Kd for RRMM

By Nathan Fisher

Share:

Jul 6, 2026

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


Results from the phase III, multicenter, randomized, open-label SUCCESSOR-2 trial (NCT05552976), evaluating mezigdomide + carfilzomib + dexamethasone (MeziKd; n = 288) vs carfilzomib and dexamethasone (Kd; n = 191) for the treatment of adults with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), were presented by Meletios A. Dimopoulos at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2026 Congress, June 11–14, 2026, Stockholm, SE. Eligible patients had lenalidomide (Len)- and anti-CD38 monoclonal antibody (mAb)-exposed RRMM with progressive disease after ≥1 prior line of therapy. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS) per independent review committee (IRC), with overall survival (OS) as a key secondary endpoint. 

Key data: At a median follow-up of 10.6 months, median PFS was 18.0 months with MeziKd vs 8.3 months with Kd (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.36–0.63; p < 0.0001); this PFS benefit was maintained across all prespecified subgroups. The overall response rate (ORR) was 80.2% (complete response or better [≥CR], 26.7%) with MeziKd vs 53.4% (≥CR, 8.9%) with Kd; 12-month duration of response (DoR) was 72% vs 54%, respectively. Second PFS (PFS2) was also improved with MeziKd (23.6 months vs 13.0 months; HR, 0.53; 95% CI, 0.39–0.72), while OS was immature but favored MeziKd (HR, 0.79; 95% CI, 0.54–1.15). Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) occurred in 83.7% with MeziKd vs 56.5% with Kd; no new safety signals were observed. 

Key learning: MeziKd significantly improved PFS and response rates vs Kd alone in Len- and anti-CD38 mAb-exposed RRMM, with PFS benefit in all prespecified subgroups, supporting MeziKd as a potential new standard of care across treatment settings, including community practice. 

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content