All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, and Roche. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Results from a multicenter retrospective study, comparing real-world outcomes with daratumumab + pomalidomide + dexamethasone (DPd; n = 295) vs daratumumab + carfilzomib + dexamethasone (DKd; n = 104) for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM), were published in Clinical Lymphoma, Myeloma & Leukemia by Zayad et al. The primary outcome was progression-free survival (PFS).
Key data: Median PFS was 15 months (95% confidence interval [CI], 11–18) with DPd vs 12 months (95% CI, 8–17) with DKd (p = 0.2), while median overall survival (OS) was 38 months (95% CI, 34–57) and not reached, respectively (p = 0.5). DPd was associated with higher rates of Grade ≥3 neutropenia (36% vs 23%) and leukopenia (26% vs 14%), while DKd showed a greater incidence of cardiovascular adverse events (29% vs 18%).
Key learning: DPd and DKd demonstrated comparable real-world clinical efficacy in RRMM, with distinct toxicity profiles, supporting individualized regimen selection based on patient comorbidities, prior treatment exposure, and tolerance to hematologic or cardiovascular toxicity.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
On average, how many patients with MGUS/smoldering MM do you see in a month?