All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.
Bookmark this article
The phase II GRIFFIN study (MMY2004, NCT02874742) investigated the use of daratumumab (dara) in combination with bortezomib (V), lenalidomide (R), and dexamethasone (d; dara-VRd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are eligible for high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT). This was compared to VRd alone1
During the American Society of Hematology (ASH) meeting in San Diego, US, 2018, study investigators reported the quadruplet regimen (dara-VRd) had a manageable toxicity profile, and achieved minimal residual disease (MRD) negativity (10-5) in 50% of patients post-consolidation.2
It has now been announced that the study has met its primary endpoint with a higher percentage of patients achieving a stringent complete response (sCR) with dara-VRd compared to VRd alone.1
Given as dara-VRd versus VRd unless otherwise stated
These results add to the evidence that the addition of daratumumab to traditional triplet induction regimens can improve efficacy. This was supported by the CASSIOPEIA, part one, trial results which showed that daratumumab in combination with V + thalidomide (T) + d (dara-VTd), improved efficacy in the transplant eligible, NDMM setting. In the CASSIOPEIA trial, dara-VTd gave a 53% reduction in the risk of progression or death compared to VTd alone.3
The development of an optimal induction regimen for ASCT has evolved significantly in recent years, and was discussed by Professor Mohamad Mohty during the 45th Meeting of the European Society for Blood and Marrow Transplantation (EBMT), 2019. During this presentation, Professor Mohty noted that the GRIFFIN trial, using daratumumab in combination with a traditional triplet, like VRd, creating a quadruplet (dara-VRd), was one of the most recent innovations in ASCT induction regimen optimization.4
Additionally, the recent results of the COLUMBA trial, showing subcutaneous administration of daratumumab is non-inferior to intravenous administration, may further increase uptake of daratumumab-containing regimens, whilst increasing the patient’s quality of life during treatment.5
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox