All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
A total of 36 patients completed induction and were divided into three groups post-induction: Group A (MRD negative, n = 24), Group B (MRD positive, transplant eligible, n = 8), and Group C (MRD positive, transplant ineligible, n = 4). The primary endpoint was rate of responses ≥CR or sCR at the end of Dara-KRd induction. Secondary endpoints included MRD negativity post-induction and safety.
|
Key learnings |
At the end of induction, 53.8% of patients achieved ≥CR (90% CI: 39.6–67.7; p = 0.375), including 41% who achieved sCR. |
MRD negativity rates were 59% and 41% post-induction, and 77% and 72% at any time point, by NGS at sensitivities of 10-5 and 10-6, respectively. In Group B, 62.5% of patients were MRD negative at 10-5 after auto-HSCT, 3 of whom were also MRD negative at 10-6. |
At least 1 TEAE was reported in all patients. SAEs were noted in 38.5% of patients, of which 23.1% were treatment-related SAEs. |
Although the trial did not meet the primary endpoint, high rates of ≥CR and MRD negativity were achieved with Dara-KRd, and no new safety signals were identified. The post-induction MRD-guided approach deepened responses in patients who were MRD-positive and maintained durable MRD control in those who were MRD-negative. |
Abbreviations: auto-HSCT, autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation; CI, confidence interval; CR, complete response; Dara-KRd, daratumumab, carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone; MRD, measurable residual disease; NDMM, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; NGS, next-generation sequencing; SAE, serious adverse event; sCR, stringent complete response; TEAE, treatment-related adverse event.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
Your opinion matters
What is the most significant limitation you have identified when using lenalidomide or pomalidomide for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma?