All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.

2018-04-30T10:23:38.000Z

Microfluidic device improves detection of genetic abnormalities and treatment outcome in MM

Apr 30, 2018
Share:

Bookmark this article

Treatment of multiple myeloma (MM) is guided by information on a patient’s cytogenetic status in terms of the presence of certain abnormalities in their plasma cells (PCs). These are tested for using bone marrow (BM) biopsies, which in certain cases can lead to false negatives. As MM progresses it has been shown that the level of CD45 negative (CD45-) PCs increases. Therefore, it was hypothesized that enrichment of BM samples for CD45- cells, via CD45 positive (CD45+) cell depletion using tetrameric antibody complexes (TACs), would increase the level of relevant malignant cells, enabling more accurate detection of genetic abnormalities.

In a study published in Molecular Oncology by Li Gao and Yunjing Zeng from the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, and the Xinqiao Hospital, Army Military Medical University, Chongqing, China, and colleagues, a microfluidic (MF) device was used to enrich samples with malignant PCs to analyze for cytogenetic status. BM samples were taken at diagnosis from 48 newly diagnosed (ND) MM patients (pts) and each sample was subjected to either classic flow cytometry and FISH analysis, or microfluidic enrichment of CD45- PCs and size selection. Microfluidic enrichment identified abnormalities in two patients that were undetected by classic methods, and the authors detailed the resultant treatment decisions for two patients.

Key Data:

  • CD38+/CD138+ cells detected in:
    • un-manipulated bone marrow (BM) = 10.3% ± 8.5%
    • using microfluidic method enrichment (MF-CD45-TAC) = 37.7% ± 20.4% (P<0.001)
  • Therefore, the percentage of PCs was increased by depletion of CD45+ cells
  • Risk stratification of MM patients before vs after MF-CD45-TACs enrichment:
    • Rearrangements involving the 14q32 region = 11 patients (22.9%) vs 27 pts (56.3%)
    • Del(13q14) = 6 pts (12.5%) vs 37.5% (P<0.001)
    • Del(17p) = 3 pts (6.25%) vs 22.9% (P<0.001)
    • 1q21 gains = 9 pts (18.8%) vs 41.7% (P=0.001)
  • Different cytogenetic abnormalities require different treatment plans, so the authors described two cases for which the more accurate diagnosis from microfluidic enrichment was able to positively influence the treatment decision

Patient 1:  

  • A 60-year old male was diagnosed with type IgG, λ MM, ISS stage III
  • No cytogenetic abnormalities were found using the classic methods; pt was classified as low-risk
  • MF-CD45-TACs enrichment led to detection of del(17p) & del(13q14), and reclassification as high-risk
  • Treatment was switched from VTD (bortezomib, thalidomide, and dexamethasone) to VRD (bortezomib, lenalidomide, dexamethasone) induction therapy leading to very good partial remission (VGPR)
  •  After four courses of autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT), pt achieved complete remission (CR)
  • Another five courses of VRD consolidation therapy were given; pt now remains stable in CR, with RD maintenance therapy

Patient 2:

  • A 41-year old male, diagnosed with IgG, λ type MM, ISS stage III
  • FISH analysis revealed del(13q14) and IgH rearrangement; pt was classified as intermediate-risk
  • MF-CD45-TAC enrichment detected del(17p), leading to a high-risk classification
  • Treatment with 4 cycles of VTD led to very good partial remission (VGPR)
  • Pt underwent a transplant with familial donated allogeneic hematopoietic stem cells
  • Achieved a stringent CR with thalidomide maintenance therapy

This microfluidic method (MF-CD45-TACs) was able to enrich malignant PCs and significantly increased the detection rate for genetic abnormalities in MM patients. This overcomes the problem of false negatives due to ‘the unpredictable distribution and rarity of MM cells’. Of note, the authors were able to use two case studies to illustrate the detection of abnormalities that went undetected with the use of classic methods. As a consequence, the treatment plans for the two patients were amended accordingly and led to improved outcomes.  

  1. Gao L. et al. Microfluidic enrichment of plasma cells improves treatment of multiple myeloma. Mol Oncol. 2018 Apr 11. DOI: 10.1002/1878-0261.12201.

Your opinion matters

Which dosing schedule for belantamab mafodotin do you think is optimal for providing an efficacy benefit while managing toxicities?
2 votes - 42 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox