All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.
Bookmark this article
At the 21st IMS Annual Meeting 2024, González-Calle presented results from the GEM-BELA-VRd (NCT04802356) trial, which investigated the safety and efficacy of the addition of belantamab mafodotin to the standard-of-care regimen of VRd for the treatment of patients with transplant-eligible NDMM.1 This focused on ocular toxicities, as well as durability of response and MRD negativity rates over the different phases of treatment.1 |
Key learnings: |
During the induction phase, the most common AEs were ocular, with 40% of patients experiencing blurred vision, with a BCVA of 20/50. However, blurred vision resolved in 94% of patients following adjunctive therapy or dose adjustments. Treatment discontinuation due to ocular AEs occurred in 2% of patients. |
In the consolidation phase, a BCVA of 20/50 was observed in 19% of patients, with 88% of cases resolving after adjunctive therapy or dose adjustments. There were no discontinuations due to ocular toxicity during this phase. |
At 1 year of maintenance, a BCVA of 20/50 was observed in 26% of patients, with 91% of cases resolving through adjunctive therapy or dose adjustments. During this phase, 4% of patients discontinued treatment due to ocular toxicity. |
The ORR remained consistent across all treatment phases at 94%, with the proportion of CR increasing from 36% during induction to 82% at 1 year of maintenance. |
The proportion of patients with MRD negativity also increased throughout the treatment phases, from 60.9% at induction to 91.2% after 1 year of maintenance. |
At 24 months, the PFS and OS rates were both 85% in the total cohort treated with Bela-VRd. These rates were similar in patients with high-risk cytogenetics. |
The safety profile of the Bela-VRd combination was largely comparable to that of the VRd regimen, with the exception of an increase in ocular toxicities. In most cases, ocular toxicities were resolved through dose adjustments. |
Efficacy data are also promising, with durable responses and increasing MRD negativity observed throughout the different phases of treatment, indicating further investigation of belantamab mafodotin in the newly diagnosed setting. |
Abbreviations: AE, adverse event; BCVA, best corrected visual acuity; Bela-VRd, belantamab mafodotin-bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone; CR, complete response; IMS, International Myeloma Society; MRD, measurable residual disease; NDMM, newly diagnosed multiple myeloma; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival; VRd, bortezomib-lenalidomide-dexamethasone.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox