All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

EloPd for the treatment of RRMM: Real-world efficacy and safety data

Feb 27, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


The combination of elotuzumab, pomalidomide, and dexamethasone (EloPd) was investigated as part of the ELOQUENT-3 (NCT02654132) trial leading to its approval in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received ≥2 prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor.1

Here, we summarize a publication by Gentile et al.1 in Haematologica on real-world experiences and outcomes in patients with RRMM treated with EloPd compared with the clinical trial data from ELOQUENT-3.

Study design1

  • Data was collected from 200 patients with RRMM treated with EloPd across multiple Italian centers outside of clinical trials
  • Outcome data was compared with the ELOQUENT-3 trial data to establish real-world EloPd efficacy and safety
  • All patients were treated with EloPd according to the marketing approval

Key findings1

  • The overall response rate was 55.4% (Figure 1) with a median time to response of 1.8 months, comparable with ELOQUENT-3 at 53%
  • Median progression-free survival (PFS) was 7 months, shorter than what was observed in ELOQUENT-3 which was 10.3 months
  • At a median follow-up of 9 months, 126 patients had stopped treatment with EloPd; 88.9% of these were due to disease progression
  • Median overall survival was observed at 17.5 months compared with 29.8 months observed in ELOQUENT-3
  • The characteristic associated with the poorest 12-month PFS rate was an International Staging System Stage III at 24.2% and a hazard ratio of 2.55 (Figure 2)
  • Adverse events and toxicity profiles were comparable with ELOQUENT-3, and no significant differences were observed depending on age

Figure 1. Overall response rate* 

CR, complete response; ORR, overall response rate; PR, partial response; VGPR, very good PR.
*Data from Gentile, et al.1


Figure 2. 12-month PFS and OS rates by characteristic* 

ASCT, autologous stem cell transplant; CrCL, creatinine clearance; ISS, International Staging System; LOT, line of therapy; mo, month; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression-free survival.
*Data from Gentile, et al.1

 

Key learnings

  • Real world data in patients with RRMM treated with EloPd is comparable with ELOQUENT-3 trial data.
  • Few key outcomes, such as PFS, differed from clinical trial data. This is likely attributed to stringent inclusion and exclusion criteria in clinical trials leading to a non-representative population.
  • Results from this retrospective trial provide additional evidence to support the use of EloPd in patients with RRMM who have received ≥2 prior therapies, including lenalidomide and a proteasome inhibitor.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Are you currently re-using anti-CD38 therapy in patients with multiple myeloma who have been previously exposed but were not refractory to it?