All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

DREAMM-8: Patient-reported outcomes with belantamab mafodotin + Pd for RRMM

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Nov 27, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.


Results from the multicenter, phase III DREAMM-8 trial (NCT04484623) comparing patient-reported outcomes (PROs) with belantamab mafodotinpomalidomidedexamethasone (BPd, n = 155) vs pomalidomide + bortezomib + dexamethasone (PVd, n = 147) in 302 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) were recently published by Dimopoulos et al. in The Lancet Haematology

Key data: At a median follow-up of 21.8 months, health-related quality of life (HRQoL) remained stable over time in both groups. Between Weeks 5 and 53, meaningful improvement (≥10 points) in European Organisation for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) global health status/quality of life scores was more commonly observed in patients treated with BPd than PVd. Blurred vision was the adverse event (AE) most commonly reported as severe or very severe (43% in the BPd group vs 9% in the PVd group), followed by fatigue (38% vs 35%, respectively). Post hoc linear regression analysis suggested fatigue had the greatest negative impact on quality of life (QoL) measures while blurred vision had relatively minor effects.

Key learning: Belantamab mafodotin + Pd demonstrated manageable ocular toxicity with minimal impact on HRQoL, supporting its use for the treatment of RRMM despite higher rates of self-reported ocular events.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

HCPs, what do you view as the greatest barrier to the use of belantamab mafodotin combinations in clinical practice?