All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by AbbVie, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Legend Biotech and Caribou Biosciences. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Results from a frailty subgroup analysis of the randomized, phase III CEPHEUS trial (NCT03652064), evaluating daratumumab + bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (DVRd) vs bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (VRd) in patients with transplant-ineligible or transplant-deferred newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), were published in Leukemia by Zweegman et al. Using the protocol defined International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) frailty scale, 256 patients were categorized as fit (DVRd, n = 124; VRd, n = 132) and 139 patients as intermediate-fit (DVRd, n = 73; VRd, n = 66). In a post hoc analysis using the Intergroupe Francophone du Myélome (IFM) simplified frailty scale, 297 patients were categorized as nonfrail (DVRd, n = 140; VRd, n = 157) and 98 as frail (DVRd, n = 57; VRd, n = 41).
Key data: DVRd improved progression-free survival (PFS) vs VRd across all frailty subgroups: IMWG fit (hazard ratio [HR], 0.59; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.39–0.91; p = 0.0149), IMWG intermediate-fit (HR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.34–0.91; p = 0.0189), IFM nonfrail (HR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.39–0.86; p = 0.0054), and IFM frail (HR, 0.51; 95% CI, 0.28–0.93; p = 0.0242). Measurable residual disease (MRD)-negativity ≥complete response (CR) rates, at a sensitivity of 10-5 and 10-6, were also higher with DVRd across all subgroups. Bortezomib discontinuation due to treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was lower with DVRd vs VRd in frailer subgroups (IMWG intermediate-fit: 9.6% vs 19.0%; IFM frail: 12.4% vs 25.6%), while discontinuation due to peripheral sensory neuropathy was lower with DVRd across all frailty subgroups. Serious infection rates with DVRd vs VRd were 35.5% vs 32.6% in IMWG-fit, 46.6% vs 41.3% in IMWG intermediate-fit, 36.4% vs 30.8% in IFM-nonfrail, and 47.4% vs 53.8% in IFM-frail patients.
Key learning: In this analysis, DVRd was associated with improved PFS and higher MRD-negative ≥CR rates vs VRd across IMWG fit and intermediate-fit and IFM nonfrail and frail subgroups, supporting its use across the frailty subgroups evaluated in transplant-ineligible or transplant-deferred patients with NDMM.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content
This content is accurate as of the date of publication and is not updated retrospectively. Please refer to the latest available evidence, guidelines, and relevant regulatory information when making clinical decisions.
Your opinion matters
Regarding bispecific antibodies for multiple myeloma, which of the following do you consider the biggest hurdle for patients and caregivers?