All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
On January 27, 2026, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) announced approval for subcutaneous (SC) daratumumab (Dara) in combination with bortezomib + lenalidomide + dexamethasone (VRd) for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) who are ineligible for autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT).
The approval was supported by data from the phase III CEPHEUS trial (NCT03652064), which evaluated SC Dara + VRd (DVRd) vs VRd alone in 395 patients with NDMM (n = 197 received DVRd). The rates of measurable residual disease (MRD)-negativity were 52.3% and 34.8% in the DVRd and VRd arms, respectively (p = 0.0005). The DVRd arm also demonstrated a superior progression-free survival (PFS; hazard ratio [HR], 0.60; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.41–0.88; p = 0.0078); the median PFS was not reached in either cohort. In patients achieving a complete response or better (≥CR), the DVRd arm had higher rates of MRD-negativity (68.7% vs 59.5%) and sustained MRD-negativity (42.6% vs 25.3%, p = 0.0003) vs the VRd arm.
References