All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.

2018-04-16T07:33:12.000Z

Treatment to suppression of focal lesions in NDMM is an important therapeutic goal

Apr 16, 2018
Share:

Bookmark this article

Clinical imaging is increasingly used for both diagnosis and therapeutic assessment of numerous cancers. Fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography (PET) with computed tomography (CT) attenuation correction (18F-FDG PET/CT) evaluates glucose metabolism, providing a quantitative readout for the presence of active lesions.

Faith E. Davies, from the Myeloma Institute, University of Arkansas for Medical Sciences, Little Rock, AR, US, and colleagues, conducted a study in which they analyzed the prognostic significance of suppressing PET/CT activity in focal lesions (FLs)  of newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) patients, at various time points after therapeutic intervention. The study was published in Haematologica in March 2018.

Study design:

  • PET-CT analysis data were collected from 596 patients (pts) enrolled in the TT4-TT6 clinical trial series
  • Treatment included combination chemotherapy as induction with double autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT), post-transplant consolidation, and 3-years of planned maintenance with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone
  • PET-CT scan protocol:
    • IV administration of 10-15 mCi (370-555 Mbq) of FDG following 6-8 hrs of fasting
    • Images were acquired 50-70 min after injection
    • FLs defined as areas measuring at least 1cm
  • Clinical response was assessed using International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) definitions and flow cytometry was used to assess minimal residual disease (MRD)

Patient characteristics:

  • Age ≥ 65 years = 33%
  • Cytogenetic abnormalities = 44%
  • International staging system (ISS) Stage 1 = 33%; Stage 2 = 42%; Stage 3 = 26%
  • GEP70 classification:
    • Low risk patients (pts) = 467; High risk pts = 71
  • Three-year survival estimates:
    • Progression-free survival (PFS) = 68% (95%, CI; 65–72)
    • Overall survival (OS) = 82% (95%, CI; 78–85)
  • Median follow-up = 5.1 years

Key Findings:

  • Association between the presence of ≥ 3 FLs (identified using PET-CT) at baseline and adverse PFS (P < 0.0001) and OS (P < 0.0001)
Table 1. Clinical outcome estimates at each PET-CT timepoint in relation to the number of focal lesions

  • No significant difference in PFS and OS between patients who achieved 100% suppression of FL post-therapy at each time-point studied (day 7, end of induction, post-transplantation, and maintenance) and patients with no FL present at baseline
  • A significantly better outcome in patients with undetectable FLs at each time-point in comparison to patients with ≥ 1 detectable FL
  • There was an association between a sustained signal at the FL and adverse outcomes
  • Significant association between GEP70 low risk (LR) pts with ≥ 3FLs and an adverse outcome (PFS: P = 0.007; OS: P < 0.001)
  • Association between GEP70 high risk (LR) pts with FLs and an adverse outcome (PFS: P = 0.04; OS: P = 0.05)
  • Significant difference between patients with no FL at baseline and day 7 vs patients with ≥ 1 FL at day 7, in terms of OS (for GEP70 low risk pts, P = 0.0025; for GEP70 high risk pts, P = 0.0211) and PFS (for GEP70 low risk pts, P = 0.0085; for GEP70 high risk pts, P = 0.0009)
  • Strong association between GEP70 high-risk status, sustained FL positivity and clinical outcome at all time points studied
  • PET/CT imaging detected FLs when MRD was negative using flow cytometry

This analysis demonstrates the valuable contribution of PET-CT imaging to the prediction of clinical outcome. NDMM patients who displayed no PET-CT FL activity after treatment by day 7, or by the end of induction, displayed a similar clinical outcome to patients who presented with no FLs at the time of diagnosis. Additionally, the results demonstrate a strong association between NDMM patients with 3 or more focal lesions and a poor PFS and OS. The authors of this study propose the integration of serial PET-CT as part of a strategic treatment plan.

  1. Davies FE. et al. Treatment to suppression of focal lesions on positron emission tomography-computed tomography is a therapeutic goal in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma. Haematologica. March 2018. DOI: 10.3324/haematol.2017.177139

Your opinion matters

HCPs, what is your preferred format for educational content on the Multiple Myeloma Hub?
60 votes - 52 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox