All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
Bookmark this article
At diagnosis of myeloma, there can be significant intraclonal heterogeneity due to the accumulation of a variety of genetic lesions.1 In order to maximize the effect of induction therapy, and avoid selecting resistant tumor cell clones, the use of combination therapies has become the norm.2 In order to further deepen response, there are multi-step treatment strategies that may include induction followed by hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and then a post-transplantation consolidation step. The Myeloma IX study found that patients with a complete response (CR) before HSCT demonstrated better progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) than those without a CR. This demonstrates that perhaps there should be a pre-transplant treatment intensification rather than the more standard post-transplant consolidation.3, 4
Graham Jackson, Newcastle University, UK, and colleagues have just published their results from the Myeloma XI trial (NCT01554852). This open label, randomized, adaptive design, phase III trial was undertaken at 110 hospitals around the UK and included three randomizations: at induction, intensification, and at maintenance treatment. The publication in Lancet Haematology covers the randomization to intensification treatment part of the study.2 A total of 583 patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), who had a suboptimal response to initial standard triplet induction treatment, were randomized to the intensification treatment and received either cyclophosphamide (C), bortezomib (V), and dexamethasone (d; CVd; n=289) or no treatment (n=294).
Patients in the CVd group received:
All data shown is CVd vs no treatment.
Graham Jackson and team concluded that the use of CVd intensification treatment significantly improved PFS when compared to no intensification in patients with NDMM who had a suboptimal response to the standard induction therapy. There was no improvement in OS.
There have been a number of other analyses from the Myeloma XI trial which have been summarized on the Multiple Myeloma Hub. They can be found here:
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox