TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Phase III CANDOR study meets primary endpoint

By Emily Smith

Share:

Sep 19, 2019


On September 13th 2019, it was announced that the phase III CANDOR study comparing daratumumab (D) in combination with carfilzomib (K) and dexamethasone (d, KdD) to Kd alone, met its primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS) in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). The KdD regimen was found to reduce the risk of progression or death by 37% compared to Kd alone.1

The KdD regimen was originally evaluated in a phase Ib study which showed the regimen was well-tolerated and had encouraging PFS rates, including in a lenalidomide-refractory population (read more below).2 These results warranted further investigation in lenalidomide-exposed patients in the phase III CANDOR trial, which, it has been announced, has met its primary endpoint.1

Phase Ib study2

The results of the phase Ib study (NCT01998971) investigating the KdD regimen, were published in Blood in August 2019. Patients were carfilzomib- and daratumumab-naïve (n= 85), had received a median of two prior lines of therapy (1–4) and 60% were refractory to lenalidomide. Daratumumab was administered as a single infusion of 16mg/kg on Day one, cycle one, in 10 patients, and as a split infusion of 8mg/kg on Days one–two of cycle one, in 75 patients.

Safety

  • Most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were:
    • Thrombocytopenia: 31%
    • Lymphopenia: 24%
    • Anemia: 21%
    • Neutropenia: 21%
  • Infusion-related reactions (single vs split infusion of daratumumab): 60% vs 43%
    • Splitting the dose of daratumumab reduced the duration of first infusion (single vs split: 7.1 vs 4.3 hours) and was feasible. This regimen may improve patient convenience.

Efficacy

  • Overall response rate (ORR): 84%
    • For lenalidomide refractory patients: 79%
  • Median PFS: not reached (NR)
    • Estimated 12-month PFS: 74%
      • For lenalidomide refractory patients: 65%

The study showed KdD induced deep and durable responses, irrespective of whether the patients had been previously treated with lenalidomide.

Read more about the phase Ib results here.

CANDOR study1,3

The CANDOR study (NCT03158688) was a phase III randomized, open-label study comparing KdD to Kd regimens in 466 patients with RRMM. Patients had relapsed after one to three prior therapies. The primary endpoint was PFS with secondary endpoints of ORR, rate of minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response, duration of response, overall survival, time to next treatment, time to progression, time to response, persistence of MRD-negativity and quality of life assessments.3

Treatment regimen1,3

  • Carfilzomib was administered as an intravenous (IV) infusion, twice weekly on Days one, two, eight, nine, 15 and 16 of each 28-day cycle:
    • On cycle one, Day one and two, dose was 20mg/m2
    • Subsequent doses were 56mg/m2
  • Dexamethasone was administered orally or by IV infusion, weekly, at 40mg
  • Daratumumab was administered (in the KdD arm) as an IV infusion
  • Treatment was continued until disease progression

Efficacy1

  • Hazard ratio for progression or death in patients treated with KdD: 0.63, 95% CI, 0.464–0.854, p= 0.0014
  • Median PFS (KdD vs Kd): NR vs8 months

Safety1

  • Higher frequency of adverse events (AEs) in the KdD arm
  • AEs were consistent with individual drug profiles
  • Most frequent TEAEs (≥20%):
    • Thrombocytopenia
    • Anemia
    • Diarrhea
    • Hypertension
    • Upper respiratory tract infection
    • Fatigue
    • Dyspnea

References