All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a healthcare professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Abbvie, Roche, Bristol Myers Squibb, Pfizer, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Legend Biotech and Caribou Biosciences. Funders are allowed no direct influence on our content. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account to access:
Bookmark & personalize site content
Receive alerts for new content in your areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Results from a prespecified pooled analysis of three induction cohorts from the ongoing phase II MajesTEC-5 (NCT05695508) trial, evaluating teclistamab-based induction in transplant-eligible patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM), were published in Nature Medicine by Raab et al. The analysis included 49 patients who received teclistamab + daratumumab + lenalidomide (Tec-DR; Arms A/A1, n = 30) or Tec-DR + bortezomib (Tec-DVR; Arm B, n = 19), with outcomes assessed from induction, through autologous hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (auto-HSCT), and to last visit prior to initiation of maintenance therapy. The primary endpoints were the incidence and severity of adverse events (AEs) and serious AEs.
Key data: At a median follow-up of 12.3 months, all patients experienced a treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE). Grade 3/4 TEAEs occurred in 91.8% and were predominantly hematologic, including lymphopenia (59.2%), neutropenia (59.2%), and leukopenia (18.4%). Grade 3/4 infections occurred in 36.7% of patients, while cytokine release syndrome (CRS) occurred in 67.3% (all Grade 1/2 and resolved). Serious TEAEs occurred in 55.1% of patients, and no treatment-related immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) was reported. At premaintenance, the cumulative measurable residual disease (MRD)-negative complete response (CR) rate was 91.8% and the overall response rate (ORR) was 100%.
Key learning: Teclistamab-based induction with daratumumab and lenalidomide, with or without bortezomib, was feasible before auto-HSCT, with a consistent safety profile compared with the individual components and early MRD negativity rates, supporting continued evaluation as an immune-based, steroid-sparing first-line strategy for transplant-eligible NDMM.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content