All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.
Bookmark this article
Iberdomide – efficacy and safety in RRMM
The Multiple Myeloma Hub spoke with Sagar Lonial, Winship Cancer Institute of Emory University, Atlanta, US. We asked, what are the key efficacy and safety data from pivotal trials of iberdomide for the treatment of multiple myeloma?
Lonial begins by outlining how both iberdomide and mezigdomide are novel cereblon E3 ligase modulators (CELMoDs), which bind cereblon more potently than previous agents such as lenalidomide or pomalidomide. He describes how they have been engineered to ultimately induce cell death as well as arresting cell growth, leading to a more potent immune response.
Lonial recalls that in early phase I trials of iberdomide in combination with dexamethasone, an overall response rate (ORR) of over 30% was achieved in patients who had received ≥5 prior lines of therapy, with a similar response rate in patients who were resistant to BCMA-directed therapy. Clinical studies went on to suggest that iberdomide can improve overall responses, even in the context of relapsed and refractory disease, and without increasing the number of adverse events (AEs) – and Lonial notes that this represents a second important differentiation for novel CELMoDs vs previous agents developed for the treatment of multiple myeloma.
Lonial discusses that gastrointestinal, neurologic, and thrombotic toxicities, fatigue, and non-hematologic Grade 3/4 AEs are common with lenalidomide and pomalidomide, and that reductions in such toxicities with novel CELMoDs should enable patients to stay on a full dose of treatment and for potentially longer durations. He notes that this is being tested in a maintenance trial from the European Myeloma Network (EMN) group, where lenalidomide will be directly compared with iberdomide.
Lonial goes on to outline two ongoing trials that may ultimately lead to the FDA approval of iberdomide. The first is the EXCALIBER-RRMM trial (NCT04975997), a phase III study comparing the efficacy and safety of iberdomide in combination with dexamethasone and daratumumab (IberDd) vs daratumumab, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (DVd) in participants with RRMM. This trial is currently recruiting but is nearing completion of enrolment. The second trial is a randomized, phase III, maintenance trial of lenalidomide vs iberdomide in patients with RRMM post autologous stem cell transplant.
Lonial concludes that with these and other trials in progress, iberdomide will should soon be added to the armamentarium of new drugs that not only kill myeloma cells but also enhance the efficacy of other immune agents, including anti CD38 antibodies, bispecific antibodies, and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies.
Agree
%
Disagree
%
This educational resource is independently supported by Bristol Myers Squibb. All content is developed by SES in collaboration with an expert steering committee; funders are allowed no influence on the content of this resource.
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox