The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
On Sunday 16 June at the 24th Congress of the European Hematology Association (EHA), Darrell White, Dalhousie University, Nova Scotia, CN, on behalf of Christina Gasparetto, Duke University Cancer Center, North Carolina, US, presented a phase Ib/II trial on selinexor (S), daratumumab (D), and dexamethasone (d; SDd) in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).1
Selinexor is a first-in-class selective inhibitor of exportin-1 (XPO1), which is involved in nuclear protein exportation and is found in myeloma cells. Pre-clinical evidence indicates that selinexor blocks the translation of oncoproteins and that it works synergistically with dexamethasone to induce cytotoxicity in vitro2 and in heavily-pretreated MM patients.3
The primary objectives of this multicenter, open-label study were the determination of the maximum tolerated dose and recommended SDd phase II dose, as well as safety and preliminary SDd efficacy in patients with RRMM.
Table 1. Key baseline characteristics:
ASCT, autologous stem cell transplant; IMiDs, immunomodulatory drugs; PIs, proteasome inhibitors; SDd, Selinexor, daratumumab and dexamethasone |
|
Baseline characteristic |
Patient cohort (N=34) |
---|---|
Median age (range) |
68 (44–83) |
Male patients |
56% |
Median time from diagnosis to SDd treatment (range) |
5.6 (<1–14) |
Median number of prior lines (range): Treated: Refractory to PIs Treated: Refractory to IMiDs ASCT Daratumumab treated |
3 (2–10) 100%:85% 100%:76% 71% 6% |
Table 2. Preliminary efficacy outcomes:
MR, minimal response; ORR, overall response rate; PD, progressive disease; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; VGPR, very good partial resonse |
||
|
Daratumumab-naïve patients (n=30) |
Total cohort (n=32) |
---|---|---|
ORR |
73% |
69% |
VGPR |
37% |
34% |
PR |
37% |
34% |
MR |
13% |
13% |
Clinical benefit rate (ORR+MR) |
86% |
81% |
SD |
13% |
16% |
PD |
- |
3% |
The recommended phase II SDd dose for the treatment of RRMM patients was 100mg of selinexor, 16mg/kg daratumumab plus 40mg dexamethasone, administered once a week. No DLTs occurred at this dose level and the safety profile was tolerable and manageable. Preliminary efficacy outcomes indicate that SDd treatment leads to deep and durable responses in RRMM patients with an ORR of 73% in daratumumab-naïve patients and 69% in the total cohort.
References