The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
Immune-based therapies in multiple myeloma (MM) include agents such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells, as well as bispecific antibody therapies. These novel agents are often associated with high initial response rates compared with standard therapies, yet most patients go on to experience a relapse. In an effort to improve duration of response, dual antigen targeting and trispecific antibodies are currently being investigated in MM.1
Here we summarize a presentation by Sham Mailankody1 from the International Myeloma Society’s 5th Immune Effector Cell Therapies in Multiple Myeloma Workshop, 2024, on antigen-targeting CAR T cells and antibody therapies in MM.
Figure 1. Methods of dual antigen-targeting in MM*
CAR, chimeric antigen receptor; TCE, T-cell engager.
Created with BioRender.com.
*Adapted from Mailankody.1
Figure 2. Response rates from RedirecTT-1 in A response-evaluable patients and B patients with EMD*
CR, complete response; PR, partial response; Q2W, once every 2 weeks; sCR, stringent complete response; tal, talquetamab; tec, teclistamab; VGPR, very good partial response.
*Adapted from Mailankody.1
Key learnings1 |
---|
|
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content