All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Descriptive study results for low-dose cyclophosphamide with bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone in RRMM

By Sara Valente

Share:

Sep 27, 2017


A phase III study published in Annals of Hematology assessed the effect of adding continuous low-dose cyclophosphamide to the backbone regimen of bortezomib and low-dose dexamethasone, in patients with primary Refractory or Relapsed Multiple Myeloma (RRMM).

The open-label, randomized and controlled study was terminated early however, due to insufficient sample size. Descriptive results were published by Martin Kropff, Department of Haematology at Medizinische Klinik III, Osnabrück, Germany, and colleagues.

Key Findings

  • Patients (pts) n = 90
  • Median follow-up = 24 months
  • Pts randomized 1:1 to receive eight 3-week cycles of bortezomib 1.3 mg/m2 and dexamethasone 20 mg (VD; n = 43) alone, or in combination with cyclophosphamide at 50 mg (VCD; n = 47)
  • Median Time to Progression (TTP): VD vs VCD = 6 vs 9.9 months (P = 0.192)
  • Disease Progression: VD vs VCD = 65% vs 72% (HR = 0.71, 95% CI; 0.43–1.19, P = 0.196)
  • Overall Response Rate (ORR): VD vs VCD = 32 pts (74%) vs 33 pts (70%)
  • Median OS: VD vs VCD = not determined vs 41 months

Safety

  • Grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy: VD vs VCD = 4% vs 15%
  • Infection rate: VD vs VCD = 52% vs 64%
  • Most common Adverse Events (AEs): thrombocytopenia (38%), peripheral neuropathy (35%), fatigue (34%), diarrhea (30%), constipation (25%) and anemia (19%)
  • Death: VD vs VCD = 13 pts (30%) vs 18 pts (38%) (HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.41–1.73, P = 0.645)

Conclusion

The study results for median TTP, ORR and disease progression did not indicate an additional benefit for the use of VCD compared with VD, for the treatment of primary RRMM patients. However, since the proposed sample size was not reached and the study was terminated early, further trials may be required to fully assess the clinical benefit of VCD. The safety profiles of both therapies were relatively similar with VCD showing slightly higher grade ≥3 peripheral neuropathy. The authors commented that the lack of benefit may be due to the use of a low-dose of cyclophosphamide and therefore investigating higher dosing schedules in a VCD combo may be of interest. 

References

Your opinion matters

Which of the following factors is most important to you when selecting a treatment for patients with multiple myeloma?