All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The phase III PERSEUS trial (NCT03710603) assessed the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous daratumumab plus bortezomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (D-VRd) induction and consolidation followed by daratumumab plus lenalidomide (D-R) maintenance in transplant-eligible (TE) patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM).1 Primary results from this trial were reported previously by the Multiple Myeloma Hub. Briefly, D-VRd followed by D-R maintenance improved progression-free survival, depth of response, and measurable residual disease (MRD) negativity vs VRd followed by R maintenance.1 Further results from this trial on the deepening of response and MRD negativity during maintenance were presented at the European Hematology Association (EHA) 2024 Hybrid Congress by Sonneveld.1 |
Key learnings: |
MRD negativity (10−6) was higher in the D-VRd + D-R arm vs the VRd + R arm at the end of consolidation (34.4% vs 16.1%), up to 12 months (43.9% vs 20.9%), 24 months (57.7% vs 27.4%), and 36 months (63.9% vs 30.8%) and increased by ~30% during maintenance with D-R. |
Among high-risk patients, D-VRd + D-R improved the MRD negativity at 10−6 (57.9% vs 30.8%) as well as sustained MRD negativity at 10−6 (30.3% vs 14.1%) vs VRd + R. |
D-R maintenance was also associated with a higher proportion of MRD-positive patients converting to MRD negativity at 10−6 (56.7% vs 25.2%; p <0.0001) and sustained MRD negativity at 10−6 (31.3% vs 10.3%; p <0.0001) vs R. |
Results of the MRD analysis from PERSEUS trial highlight the benefit of D-VRd followed by D-R maintenance in TE patients with NDMM, suggesting that this regimen could be the new standard of care for this patient population. |
Your opinion matters
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox