TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

CARTITUDE-2 cohorts A and B: Updated efficacy and safety results

By Oscar Williams

Share:

Mar 7, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in multiple myeloma.


The phase II CARTITUDE-2 trial (NCT04133636) evaluated safety and efficacy of the B-cell maturation antigen-directed chimeric antigen receptor T-cell agent ciltacabtagene autoleucel for treatment of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

During 2024 Transplantation & Cellular Therapy Meetings of the ASTCT and CIMBTR (TANDEM), Hillengass.1 presented updated results from the CARTITUDE-2 trial. We summarize the key results below.

Study design1

  • Cohort A: patients with 1–3 prior lines of therapy
  • Cohort B: patients who relapsed at ≤12 months after transplant/at antimyeloma treatment initiation if without transplant
  • All patients received a target dose of 0.75 × 106 cells/kg.
  • The primary endpoint was negative measurable residual disease at a sensitivity of 10−5.

Key findings1

  • Cohort A = 20 patients
  • Cohort B = 19 patients
  • Median follow-up 29 months
  • Most patients across both cohorts achieved negative measurable residual disease (Figure 1).

Figure 1. Rates of overall and sustained negative MRD in cohorts A and B from CARTITUDE-2 l* 

MRD, measurable residual disease.
*Adapted from Hillengass.1
†Cohort A (n = 17), cohort B (n = 15).
‡Cohort A (n = 11), cohort B (n = 13).
§Cohort A (n = 14), cohort B (n = 13).

  • Duration of response, overall survival and progression free survival rates at 24 months were comparable between the two patient cohorts (Table 1).

Table 1. ORR and OS, PFS and DOR rate at 24 months*

DOR, duration of response; ORR, overall response rate; OS, overall survival; PFS, progression free survival.
*Adapted from Hillengass.1

Cohort A
(n = 20)

Cohort B
(n = 19)

ORR, %

95

100

OS at 24 months, %

75.1

84.2

PFS at 24 months, %

75

73.3

DOR at 24 months, %

73.3

70.5

  • Most Grade 3/4 hematologic treatment related adverse events were experienced by more patients in cohort A vs cohort B (Table 2).

Table 2. Cytokine release syndrome, ICANS, and Grade 3/4 hematologic TRAE*

CRS, cytokine release syndrome; ICANS, immune cell associated neurotoxicity syndrome, TRAE, treatment-related adverse event.
*Adapted from Hillengass.1

%, unless otherwise stated

Cohort A
(n = 20)

Cohort B
(n = 19)

Any grade CRS

95

84.2

Any grade ICANS

15

5.3

Hematologic TRAE

Neutropenia

95

89.5

Lymphopenia

80

47.4

Thrombocytopenia

40

26.3

Anemia

45

47.4

Leukopenia

60

31.6

Key learnings

  • Deep and durable responses were observed with ciltacabtagene autoleucel in earlier lines of treatment, and in patients who experienced early relapse; a population with a current unmet treatment need.
  • These results also provide an early insight into potential clinical outcomes for the ongoing CARTITUDE-4 trial (NCT04181827).

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content