All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

ASH 2025 | Top abstracts: What’s hot in multiple myeloma?

Dec 3, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in multiple myeloma.


ASH 2025 | Top abstracts in multiple myeloma

To help navigate the exciting content being presented at the the 67th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, December 6–9, 2025, Orlando, US, the Multiple Myeloma Hub Steering Committee members have provided their recommendations for the top abstracts to look out for in multiple myeloma and other plasma cell dyscrasias.

Oral presentations: Saturday, December 6

Abstract TitlePresenterTime (EST)
92Earlier use of ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is associated with better immune fitness and stronger immune effects as shown by correlative analysis of peripheral blood and the bone marrow tumor microenvironment (TME) from the CARTITUDE-4 studySamir Parekh09:45–10:00
93Predictors of early relapse following ciltacabtagene autoleucel: Informing risk-adapted therapy in relapsed/refractory multiple myelomaDoris Hansen10:00–10:15
94Long-term progression-free survival benefit with ciltacabtagene autoleucel in standard-risk relapsed/refractory multiple myelomaLuciano Costa10:15–10:30
97Minimal residual disease dynamics in post-transplant patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who received daratumumab plus lenalidomide versus lenalidomide alone as maintenance therapy in the AURIGA studyAlfred Chung09:30–09:45
99Carfilzomib, lenalidomide, and dexamethasone (KRd) versus bortezomib, lenalidomide and dexamethasone (VRd) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) – interim results from the randomized phase III COBRA trialDominik Dytfeld10:00–10:15
100Safety and efficacy of elranatamab in combination with iberdomide in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: Results from the phase 1b MagnetisMM-30 trialAttaya Suvannasankha10:15–10:30
101Iberdomide maintenance after autologous stem-cell transplantation in newly diagnosed multiple myeloma: An update from the phase 2 EMN26 trialNiels van de Donk10:30–10:45
102Initial phase 1b/2 study results with sonrotoclax (BGB-11417) in combination with carfilzomib and dexamethasone in patients with t(11;14)-positive relapsed/refractory multiple myelomaHang Quach10:45–11:00
365Immune biomarkers of increased risk of infection in multiple myeloma (MM)Aintzane Zabaleta17:00–17:15  
368Sustained minimal residual disease (sMRD) negativity in transplant ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma treated with isatuximab plus lenalidomide and dexamethasone with bortezomib (Isa-VRd) versus Isa-Rd: 12-24-month data from the phase 3 BENEFIT trial (IFM 2020-05)Arthur Bobin16:15–16:30
370Role of bortezomib maintenance therapy in the anti-CD38 antibody era: Interim analysis results of a randomized phase III study for transplant-ineligible newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (JCOG1911/B-DASH study)Tomotaka Suzuki16:45–17:00

 

Oral presentations: Sunday, December 7

Abstract TitlePresenterTime (EST)
494Combined assessment of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) and measurable residual disease (MRD) for dynamic risk assessment of patients (Pts) with multiple myeloma (MM)Bruno Paiva09:45–10:00
578Ending the undetermined significance of monoclonal gammopathies (MGUS): First results of the NoMoreMGUS studyBruno Paiva12:15–12:30  
698Efficacy and safety of talquetamab + teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma and extramedullary disease: Updated phase 2 results from the RedirecTT-1 study with extended follow-upSaad Usmani16:45–17:00
701Safety and efficacy of talquetamab + teclistamab in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma from phase 1b of RedirecTT-1: Results with an extended median follow-up of 3 yearsMaría-Victoria Mateos17:30–17:45

 

Oral presentations: Monday, December 8

Abstract TitlePresenterTime (EST)
916S100A8/A9 drives T cell exhaustion and compromises the therapeutic efficacy of bispecific antibodies in multiple myelomaAdolfo Aleman15:30–15:45
1033The impact of Duffy genotype on progression-free survival (PFS) with lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (RVd) alone or RVd plus autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) and continuous R maintenance in patients (pts) with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM): Updated subgroup analysis of the phase 3 DETERMINATION trialLauren Merz16:30–16:45
1034Enhancing the safety of ciltacabtagene autoleucel in relapsed multiple myeloma (MM): Identification of potentially modifiable risk-factors associated with delayed neurotoxicity and non-relapse mortalitySurbhi Sidana

16:45–17:00

 

1035Outcomes of stem cell boost (SCB) versus supportive care alone for prolonged cytopenias after chimeric antigen receptor T cell therapy (CAR-T) in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): A multi-center real-world analysisCindy Varga

17:00–17:15

 

1037Redefining function high-risk (FHR) multiple myeloma (MM) in the context of upfront quadruplet (QUAD) therapy and autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT)Luciano Costa

17:30–17:45

 

 

Oral presentations: Tuesday, December 9

Abstract TitlePresenterTime (EST)
LBA-1Minimal residual disease (MRD)-negative outcomes following a novel, in vivo gene therapy generating anti–B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-T cells in patients with relapsed and refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Preliminary results from inMMyCAR, the first-in-human phase 1 study of KLN-1010Phoebe Joy Ho07:30–07:45  
LBA-6Phase 3 randomized study of teclistamab plus daratumumab versus investigator’s choice of daratumumab and dexamethasone with either pomalidomide or bortezomib (DPd/DVd) in patients (pts) with relapsed refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): Results of MajesTEC-3María-Victoria Mateos08:45–09:00

Posters

Abstract TitlePresenterDate and time (EST)
2253A clinical overview of infection in patients receiving elranatamab (ELRA) in combination with daratumumab (DARA) and lenalidomide (R) for newly diagnosed multiple myeloma in the MagnetisMM-6 trialJa Min ByunSaturday, December 6, 17:30–19:30
2258Randomized comparison between isatuximab-Rd versus Rd induction, followed by isa-R versus R maintenance in very elderly patients with NDMM: Efficacy data on MRD after induction (AGMT-MM04 Trial)

 

Heinz Ludwig

Saturday, December 6, 17:30–19:30
2262Long-term responders from the phase 3 DREAMM-7 study of belantamab mafodotin plus bortezomib and dexamethasone vs daratumumab plus bortezomib and dexamethasone in relapsed/refractory multiple myelomaVania HungriaSaturday, December 6, 17:30–19:30
2263Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM) eligible for transplantation and treated with isatuximab, lenalidomide, bortezomib, and dexamethasone (Isa-RVd) versus RVd alone: Results from Part 1 of the GMMG-HD7 study

 

Elias K. Mai

Saturday, December 6, 17:30–19:30
2264Deep responses and durable outcomes in patients treated with belantamab mafodotin plus pomalidomide and dexamethasone from long-term follow-up of the phase 3 DREAMM-8 studySuzanne Trudel

Saturday, December 6, 17:30–19:30

 

2265Patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma who achieved sustained minimal residual disease negativity in the DREAMM-7 trialMaría-Victoria Mateos

Saturday, December 6, 17:30–19:30

 

4069Identifying high-risk profiles and adverse prognoses in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated with bispecific antibodies: A real-world analysis of 943 treatment initiationsSaurabh ZanwarSunday, December 7, 18:00–20:00
4029Health-related quality of life with belantamab mafodotin in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): An exploratory analysis of overall quality of life in DREAMM-7Sagar Lonial

Sunday, December 7, 18:00–20:00

 

4039Primary analysis of the phase 3 randomized trial of selinexor and lenalidomide versus lenalidomide alone as maintenance therapy post autologous stem cell transplant for patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (ALLG MM23; SEALAND)Matthew ReesSunday, December 7, 18:00–20:00
4044Home administration of isatuximab subcutaneous by on-body injector in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma in the phase 3 IRAKLIA studyMaría-Victoria MateosSunday, December 7, 18:00–20:00
5820Functional high-risk relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) outcomes with belantamab mafodotin (belamaf): DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 subgroup analysisMaría-Victoria MateosMonday, December 8, 18:00–20:00
5823Patient-reported outcomes from DREAMM-7 and DREAMM-8 using the EQ-5D-3L, patient global impression of severity, and patient global impression of changeSuzanne TrudelMonday, December 8, 18:00–20:00

 

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content