All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2019-02-28T10:32:50.000Z

Update from the phase III COLUMBA (MMY3012) study 

Feb 28, 2019
Share:

Bookmark this article

The randomized, open-label, parallel assignment phase III COLUMBA (MMY3012) study (NCT03277105) investigated the impact of either subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) administration of daratumumab (Darzalex®) on response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

The study found that daratumumab, co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20), administered subcutaneously is non-inferior to IV administration.

  • Patients (N = 522) were randomized to either:
    • SC daratumumab: 1800 mg with rHuPH20 2000 U/mL (N = 263)
    • IV daratumumab: 16 mg/kg (N = 259)
  • Both were administered:
    • Once-weekly in cycles 1 and 2
    • Every two weeks in cycles 3–6
    • Every four weeks in cycle 7
    • Continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or study end
  • Co-primary endpoints:
    • Overall response rate (ORR)
    • Maximum trough of daratumumab (Ctrough)
      • Daratumumab serum pre-dose concentration on day 1 of cycle 3
  • ORR:
    • SC daratumumab: 41.1% (N = 263)
    • IV daratumumab: 37.1% (N = 259)
  • Mean Ctrough rate
    • SC daratumumab: 499 mg/mL (N = 149)
    • IV daratumumab: 463 mg/mL (N = 146)

No additional safety concerns were raised. The pharmaceutical company expected to present the data at an upcoming medical conference, publish in a peer-reviewed journal, and consider a regulatory submission for this formulation.

Providing daratumumab subcutaneously may result in a benefit to patients owing to the quicker and more convenient method of administration.

  1. OncLive. Subcutaneous daratumumab succeeds in phase III myeloma trial. https://www.onclive.com/web-exclusives/subcutaneous-daratumumab-succeeds-in-phase-iii-myeloma-trial [Accessed 2019 Feb 26]

Your opinion matters

As a result of this content, I commit to reviewing the CARTITUDE clinical program to guide my understanding of cilta-cel in clinical practice.
19 votes - 11 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox