All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

Update from the phase III COLUMBA (MMY3012) study 

By Emily Smith

Share:

Feb 28, 2019


The randomized, open-label, parallel assignment phase III COLUMBA (MMY3012) study (NCT03277105) investigated the impact of either subcutaneous (SC) or intravenous (IV) administration of daratumumab (Darzalex®) on response rates in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM).

The study found that daratumumab, co-formulated with recombinant human hyaluronidase PH20 (rHuPH20), administered subcutaneously is non-inferior to IV administration.

  • Patients (N = 522) were randomized to either:
    • SC daratumumab: 1800 mg with rHuPH20 2000 U/mL (N = 263)
    • IV daratumumab: 16 mg/kg (N = 259)
  • Both were administered:
    • Once-weekly in cycles 1 and 2
    • Every two weeks in cycles 3–6
    • Every four weeks in cycle 7
    • Continued until disease progression, unacceptable toxicity or study end
  • Co-primary endpoints:
    • Overall response rate (ORR)
    • Maximum trough of daratumumab (Ctrough)
      • Daratumumab serum pre-dose concentration on day 1 of cycle 3
  • ORR:
    • SC daratumumab: 41.1% (N = 263)
    • IV daratumumab: 37.1% (N = 259)
  • Mean Ctrough rate
    • SC daratumumab: 499 mg/mL (N = 149)
    • IV daratumumab: 463 mg/mL (N = 146)

No additional safety concerns were raised. The pharmaceutical company expected to present the data at an upcoming medical conference, publish in a peer-reviewed journal, and consider a regulatory submission for this formulation.

Providing daratumumab subcutaneously may result in a benefit to patients owing to the quicker and more convenient method of administration.

References

Your opinion matters

Which of the following factors is most important to you when selecting a treatment for patients with multiple myeloma?