All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Legend Biotech, Pfizer, Roche, and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out more
Create an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View multiple myeloma content recommended for you
Results from the phase II IZALCO (NCT05704049) study, evaluating subcutaneous (SC) isatuximab, administered by either manual injection or on-body injector (OBI), with carfilzomib + dexamethasone (Kd) for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) (N = 74), were recently published in Blood Cancer Journal by Parmar et al. The primary endpoint of this study was overall response rate (ORR). Secondary endpoints included patient preference of administration method, safety, and pharmacokinetics (PK).
Key data: At a median follow-up of 10.1 months, an ORR of 79.7% was observed with SC isatuximab, and was comparable across OBI and manual injection cohorts. Patient preference analysis (n = 47) favored OBI administration over manual injection (74.5% vs 17%, respectively; p = 0.0004). Adverse events (AEs) leading to full treatment discontinuation were observed in 8.1% of patients. The incidence of infusion reactions was 2.7%, with no infusion reactions occurring with OBI administration. PK was comparable between the two administration methods.
Key learning: SC isatuximab demonstrated comparable outcomes with OBI and manual injection delivery methods, and with previous studies of intravenous (IV) isatuximab in patients with RRMM. The majority of patients preferred OBI administration, supporting its feasibility for isatuximab SC delivery.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content