All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
Introducing
Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View content recommended for you
Find out moreThe Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. Digital educational resources delivered on the Multiple Myeloma Hub are supported by an educational grant from Janssen Biotech, Inc. View funders.
Bookmark this article
During the 17th International Myeloma Workshop (IMW), in Boston, MA, US, a ‘Myeloma Transplant and Maintenance Strategies’ session was held on Saturday 14th September 2019. In this session, Richard LeBlanc from the Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont, University of Montreal, Montreal, CA presented results of a phase II clinical trial using bortezomib in the post allo-SCT maintenance regimen.1
As part of the phase II clinical trial (NCT02308280) LeBlanc and the team aimed to determine whether the addition of maintenance bortezomib (V) to tandem autologous- and allogeneic- (allo-) stem cell transplantation (SCT) would reduce relapse rates and chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGvHD) in patients with high-risk (HR) newly diagnosed multiple myeloma (NDMM). They also aimed to determine the value of bone marrow measurable residual disease (MRD) assessment to determine the progression of the disease.
Abbreviations: ISS; international staging system, CyBorD; cyclophosphamide/bortezomib/dexamethasone, VTdD; Bortezomib/thalidomide/dexamethasone, MUD; matched unrelated donor, HCT-CI; Hematopoietic cell transplantation - specific comorbidity index |
||
Patient characteristics |
% |
|
---|---|---|
Age, median years (range) |
54 (35—64) ≤ 50 |
41 |
Sex |
Male Female |
54 46 |
ISS |
I II III Unknown |
15 36 41 8 |
Cytogenetics (n= 34) |
t(4:14) t(14:16) t (14:20) del 17p Gain 1q del 1p ≥ 2 adverse cytogenetics Any high-risk adverse cytogenetics |
15 0 0 6 24 3 18 65 |
Induction |
CyBorD VTdD |
82 18 |
Number of induction cycles |
Median four Range 4 — 7 |
|
Maintenance |
Lenalidomide |
13 |
Comorbidity index (HCT-CI) |
0 1 2 3 |
49 15 21 15 |
Donors |
Sibling MUD |
41 59 |
Responses were determined according to the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) guidelines2 (Table 2)
Abbreviations: CR; complete response, VGPR; very good partial response, PR; partial response, SD; stable disease, PD; progressive disease |
|||||
Induction (n= 39) |
After ASCT (n= 39) |
After allo-SCT (n= 39) |
During V (n= 38) |
After V (n= 31) |
|
---|---|---|---|---|---|
% |
|||||
≥ CR |
NE |
56 |
64 |
77 |
61 |
VGPR |
72 |
36 |
23 |
8 |
3 |
PR |
28 |
8 |
5 |
0 |
0 |
SD |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
0 |
PD |
0 |
0 |
8 |
16 |
35 |
Overall survival (OS) at two years was 92% (95%CI 77 — 97)
Progression-free survival (PFS) at two years was 67% (95%CI 49 — 80)
Three patients died (one from the progression of myeloma, and two from GvHD/infection)
Myeloma progression was noted in 14 patients
On MRD assessment, < 50 cells were associated with a cumulative incidence of progression at two years of 27%, and ≥ 50 cells, an 82% cumulative incidence of progression at two years
In terms of V safety, side-effects included diarrhea (n= 1), hemorrhagic cystitis (n= 3) and brain infection (n= 2)
Grade II—IV acute GvHD (aGvHD) was observed in 26% at 12 months (95% CI 13 — 40) and moderate/severe cGvHD was observed in 46% at 24 months (95% CI 29—61)
When compared with a historical control, there was a significant reduction in all grades (85 vs 56%, p= 0.0002) and of moderate/severe (69 vs 46%, p= 0.008) cGvHD, and a non-significant reduction in severe cGvHD (26 vs 11%, p= 0.065) with the addition of V
LeBlanc concluded that adding V into the post allo-SCT maintenance regimen is safe and may reduce cGvHD development and severity. They also found that low MRD six months after V is related to improved outcomes. He added that longer-term follow-up was needed to evaluate the curative ability of this regimen.
Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox