All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

IMS-IMWG recommended Consensus Genomic Staging of high-risk MM

By Sheetal Bhurke

Share:

Oct 16, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in multiple myeloma.


The International Myeloma Society (IMS) and the International Myeloma Working Group (IMWG) convened an expert panel of researchers and clinicians to establish an updated, data-driven consensus definition of high-risk multiple myeloma (MM). Avet-Loiseau et al. published a consensus definition based on new evidence from molecular and genomic assays, updated clinical data, and contemporary risk stratification concepts in the Journal of Clinical Oncology.

Key data: High-risk MM should be defined by the presence of at least one of these abnormalities: deletion (del17p) and/or TP53 mutation; translocation (t) including t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) along with 1q1 and/or del(1p32); monoallelic del(1p32) along with 1q1 or biallelic del(1p32); or β2 microglobulin (≥5.5 mg/L) with normal creatinine (<1.2 mg/dL).

Key learning: The IMS-IMWG Consensus Genomic Staging of high-risk MM is based on data of underlying genomic/molecular features, supporting its ability to improve outcomes in this patient population. The universal use of the definition in clinical trials is recommended to ensure uniformity of high-risk patient populations across future trials.  

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Which of the following reflects your thoughts about the feasibility of nursing staff preparing oncology treatments at the bedside at your clinical practice site, as opposed to in the pharmacy?