All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub uses cookies on this website. They help us give you the best online experience. By continuing to use our website without changing your cookie settings, you agree to our use of cookies in accordance with our updated Cookie Policy

Introducing

Now you can personalise
your Multiple Myeloma Hub experience!

Bookmark content to read later

Select your specific areas of interest

View content recommended for you

Find out more
  TRANSLATE

The Multiple Myeloma Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the Multiple Myeloma Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The Multiple Myeloma Hub and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

Steering CommitteeAbout UsNewsletterContact
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
LOADING
You're logged in! Click here any time to manage your account or log out.
2023-01-20T15:02:29.000Z

How can we identify early the best responders to ide-cel?

Featured
Jan 20, 2023
Share:
Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new development in the monitoring of multiple myeloma.

Bookmark this article

During the 64th American Society of Hematology (ASH) Annual Meeting and Exposition, the Multiple Myeloma Hub was pleased to speak to Bruno Paiva, University of Navarra, Pamplona, ES. We asked, How can we identify early the best responders to idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel)?

How can we identify early the best responders to ide-cel?

In this interview, the results of the KarMMa phase II clinical trial are discussed, as presented at the 64th ASH Annual Meeting and Exposition. Paiva examines measurable residual disease (MRD) compared with serological response following ide-cel and the ideal timepoint for assessing depth of response. Paiva concludes by describing the relationship between early undetectable MRD following ide-cel infusion and progression-free survival in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma.

Your opinion matters

As a result of this content, I commit to reviewing the CARTITUDE clinical program to guide my understanding of cilta-cel in clinical practice.
23 votes - 8 days left ...

Newsletter

Subscribe to get the best content related to multiple myeloma delivered to your inbox