All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.
The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
Roche is the latest company to have clinical trials with a checkpoint inhibitor put on hold by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA). Trials with atezolizumab were put on hold on September 18th, and follows the decision by the FDA in July this year to call a stop to clinical trials with Merck’s pembrolizumab, as well as a partial halt on trials with Bristol-Myers Squibb’s nivolumab, AstraZeneca’s durvalumab and MerckKGaA and Pfizer's avelumab. All of these were also being tested in combination therapies for MM.
This domino effect follows a higher than average number of deaths in the pembrolizumab trials, which raised concerns that there may be an inherent safety issue with this class of drug when used in certain combinations – see previous MM Hub article. This has bought the FDA more time to gather details, as patient safety remains their priority.
In this latest decision, the trials called to a halt were early phase Ib and phase Ib/II trials, assessing the efficacy of atezolizumab in combination with either lenalidomide or pomalidomide to treat Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma (RRMM).
Atezolizumab is a monoclonal antibody against PD-L1 (programmed death-ligand 1), which already has FDA approval to treat a number of other cancers, including lung and bladder cancer. Interestingly, no safety concerns have been raised prior to this, suggesting that only in this setting may it pose a problem. Whilst the role of the PD-1/PD-L1 axis is well understood, the interplay with other signals specifically in MM has yet to be fully described, as well as the synergistic effect of combining the different regimens, in particular with other immunomodulatory drugs (IMiDs). Answering this key question is likely to be on the agenda in many research labs going forward.
References
Your opinion matters
Are you currently re-using anti-CD38 therapy in patients with multiple myeloma who have been previously exposed but were not refractory to it?