All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

FDA approves subcutaneous daratumumab in combination with VRd for NDMM

By Jennifer Reilly

Share:

Aug 1, 2024

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in newly diagnosed MM.


On July 30, 2024, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved subcutaneous daratumumab (D) in combination with bortezomib (V), lenalidomide (R), and dexamethasone (d) as induction and consolidation in patients with newly diagnosed multiple myeloma who are eligible for autologous stem cell transplant.1

This approval was based on data from the phase III PERSEUS trial. The Multiple Myeloma Hub has previously reported on the primary safety and efficacy data from the PERSEUS trial (NCT03710603).1

PERSEUS pivotal data1

  • In total, 709 patients were randomized 1:1 to receive D-VRd (n = 355) or VRd (n = 354).
  • Treatment with D-VRd resulted in a significantly higher progression-free survival (PFS) rate compared with VRd alone, with a hazard ratio of 0.4 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.29–0.57; p < 0.0001).
  • Median PFS was not reached in either treatment arm.
  • With a median follow-up of 47.5 months, the 18-month estimated PFS rates were 84.3% and 67.7% in the D-VRd and VRd arm, respectively.
  • The most common toxicities experienced by ≥20% of patients treated in the D-VRd arm included peripheral neuropathy, fatigue, edema, pyrexia, upper respiratory tract infections, constipation, diarrhea, musculoskeletal pain, insomnia, and rash.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

Are you currently re-using anti-CD38 therapy in patients with multiple myeloma who have been previously exposed but were not refractory to it?