All content on this site is intended for healthcare professionals only. By acknowledging this message and accessing the information on this website you are confirming that you are a Healthcare Professional. If you are a patient or carer, please visit the International Myeloma Foundation or HealthTree for Multiple Myeloma.

  TRANSLATE

The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.

The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.

Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients

Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.

Find out more

EC approves SC daratumumab for the treatment of HR smoldering MM

By Jennifer Reilly

Share:

Jul 24, 2025

Learning objective: After reading this article, learners will be able to cite a new clinical development in smoldering MM.


On July 23, 2025, the European Commission approved subcutaneous daratumumab monotherapy for the treatment of patients with high-risk (HR) smoldering multiple myeloma (MM).

This approval represents the first authorized treatment for patients with HR smoldering MM, and was based on data from the phase III AQUILA study (NCT03301220). The Multiple Myeloma Hub has previously reported the safety and efficacy results from AQUILA.

AQUILA pivotal data

  • Treatment with daratumumab resulted in a significantly improved 60-month progression-free survival rate at 63.1% vs 40.8% in patients undergoing active monitoring (HR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.36–0.67; p < 0.001).
  • There was also a numerically higher 5-year overall survival rate observed with daratumumab vs active monitoring at 93.0% and 86.9%, respectively.
  • The median time to treatment initiation for active MM was not reached among patients who received daratumumab and was 50.2 months for patients undergoing active monitoring (HR, 0.46; 95% CI, 0.33–0.62; p < 0.0001).
  • The safety profile for daratumumab was consistent with that observed in previous studies.
  • The incidence of Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) was higher with daratumumab treatment at 40.4% vs 30.1% with active monitoring.
  • The most common TEAE observed in either cohort was hypertension.
  • TEAEs leading to discontinuation of daratumumab occurred in 5.7% of patients, with 1% experiencing a fatal TEAE.

References

Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:

The content was clear and easy to understand

The content addressed the learning objectives

The content was relevant to my practice

I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content

Your opinion matters

What is the most significant limitation you have identified when using lenalidomide or pomalidomide for the treatment of patients with multiple myeloma?