The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) is licensed in Europe and the United States for the treatment of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) who have received three or more prior therapies, including an immunomodulatory agent (IMiD), a proteasome inhibitor (PI), and an anti‑CD38 antibody, and have demonstrated disease progression on the last therapy.1 The approvals of cilta-cel approvals were based on long-term data from the CARTITUDE-1 trial (NCT03548207).1
CARTIFAN-1 (NCT03758417) is a phase II clinical trial of cilta-cel for the treatment of patients with RRMM.2 In November 2022, Mi et al.2 published the initial safety and efficacy results from this trial, which we are pleased to summarize here.
CARTIFAN-1 is a phase II, open-label clinical trial, with a sample size of ≥45 patients to give the study >90% power. All patients had received ≥3 prior lines of treatment, including a PI and IMiD; however, prior anti-CD38 antibody exposure was not required as no relevant drug was licensed in China at the start of recruitment. Patients were excluded if they had received previous chimeric antigen receptor T-cell or B-cell maturation antigen-targeted therapy or had hepatitis B virus positivity. Eligible patients received a single cilta-cel infusion 4–6 weeks after lymphodepletion with cyclophosphamide and fludarabine.
As shown in Figure 1, a total of 64 patients were recruited, among which 16 discontinued treatment prior to cilta-cel infusion. Overall, 47 patients received the full dose of cilta-cel, with one patient receiving a reduced dose.
Figure 1. Patients recruited to CARTIFAN-1*
*Adapted from Mi et al.2
†47 received the target dose of 0.75 × 106 (range, 0.5–1.0 × 106) chimeric antigen receptor-positive viable T cell/kg.
Patient characteristics of the all-treated population can be seen in Table 1.
Table 1. Characteristics of patients who received ciltacabtagene autoleucel*
BCMA, B-cell maturation antigen; ECOG, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; IMiD, immunomodulatory drug; ISS, International Staging System; PI, proteasome inhibitor. |
|
Characteristic, % (unless otherwise stated) |
All treated patients |
---|---|
Median age (range), years |
61.0 (30–72) |
Male |
66.7 |
Median time since diagnosis (range), years |
3.7 (1.4–10.2) |
Presence of extramedullary plasmacytomas |
10.4 |
Bone marrow plasma cells ≥60%† |
16.7 |
Tumor BCMA expression ≥50%‡ |
64.9 |
ECOG performance status score |
|
0 |
45.8 |
1 |
54.2 |
ISS stage |
|
I |
43.8 |
II |
37.5 |
III |
18.8 |
High-risk cytogenetics |
43.8 |
t(14;4) |
22.9 |
De17p |
20.8 |
t(14;16) |
0 |
Median number of prior therapies, range |
4 (3–9) |
Prior therapy |
|
Exposed to carfilzomib |
6.3 |
Refractory to carfilzomib |
4.2 |
Exposed to bortezomib |
100 |
Refractory to bortezomib |
75.0 |
Exposed to ixazomib |
39.6 |
Refractory to ixazomib |
37.5 |
Exposed to lenalidomide |
87.5 |
Refractory to lenalidomide |
83.3 |
Exposed to pomalidomide |
6.3 |
Refractory to pomalidomide |
6.3 |
Exposed to thalidomide |
77.1 |
Refractory to thalidomide |
64.6 |
Exposed to daratumumab |
31.3 |
Refractory to daratumumab |
27.1 |
Triple-class exposed§ |
31.3 |
Triple-class refractory§ |
18.8 |
Refractory to PI |
85.4 |
Refractory to IMiD |
91.7 |
Refractory to last line of therapy |
97.9 |
As of the data cut-off of July 2012, two patients had been retreated with cilta-cel.
Considering an ORR of 89.6%, the results of CARTIFAN-1 were similar to CARTITUDE-1 (ORR, 97.9%), but with a higher rate of deaths (16.7% vs 6.2%) and Grade 3/4 cytokine release syndrome (35% vs 4%). With high CR rates and minimal residual disease negativity, the initial results demonstrate cilta-cel can achieve deep treatment responses in patients with RRMM. However, the study also highlights the significant treatment-related morbidity associated with cilta-cel, and the need for supportive measures such as blood and platelet transfusions. Patients treated with cilta-cel must be regarded as heavily pre-treated, with healthcare infrastructure and services that can support treatment to ensure patients can safely derive maximum benefit.
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content