The mm Hub website uses a third-party service provided by Google that dynamically translates web content. Translations are machine generated, so may not be an exact or complete translation, and the mm Hub cannot guarantee the accuracy of translated content. The mm and its employees will not be liable for any direct, indirect, or consequential damages (even if foreseeable) resulting from use of the Google Translate feature. For further support with Google Translate, visit Google Translate Help.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is an independent medical education platform, sponsored by Bristol Myers Squibb, GSK, Johnson & Johnson, Pfizer, Roche and Sanofi. The levels of sponsorship listed are reflective of the amount of funding given. View funders.
Now you can support HCPs in making informed decisions for their patients
Your contribution helps us continuously deliver expertly curated content to HCPs worldwide. You will also have the opportunity to make a content suggestion for consideration and receive updates on the impact contributions are making to our content.
Find out moreCreate an account and access these new features:
Bookmark content to read later
Select your specific areas of interest
View mm content recommended for you
As a first-line therapy, autologous stem cell transplantation (ASCT) remains an important option for patients with multiple myeloma (MM) who are eligible for transplant. With the introduction of novel drugs and advancements in treatments, there are now different approaches taken before and after ASCT, including different combinations of induction, consolidation, and maintenance therapy.
The Multiple Myeloma Hub is pleased to present a visual abstract on a real-world retrospective cohort study by Côté J, et al.1 evaluating the outcomes of ASCT performed as first-line therapy in patients with newly diagnosed MM. The different regimens used for the transplant treatment sequence (induction, consolidation, maintenance) and their contribution to clinical outcomes were evaluated. The study found that:
References
Please indicate your level of agreement with the following statements:
The content was clear and easy to understand
The content addressed the learning objectives
The content was relevant to my practice
I will change my clinical practice as a result of this content